Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2003 13(3):240-245; doi:10.1093/eurpub/13.3.240
© 2003 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delnoij, D. M.J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Velden, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delnoij, D. M.J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Velden, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Policy

Building integrated health systems in central and eastern Europe

An analysis of WHO and World Bank views and their relevance to health systems in transition

Diana M.J. Delnoij1,*, Niek S. Klazinga2 and Koos van der Velden3

1 NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands 2 Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Netherlands School of Public Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Background: Two questions are addressed. i) What are the views on health and health systems as expressed in the World Development Report 2000/2001 of the WB and the World Health Report 2000 and Health 21 of the World Health Organization, and how compatible are those views? ii) To what extent will compliance of CEEC and NIS with the WHO and WB recommendations result in health systems that produce maximum health for all by adequately addressing the needs of their populations? Method: The reports prepared by the World Bank and the World Health Organization were assessed against the theoretical framework of a needs-based public health approach. Results: It is observed that the WHO and WB approaches are currently converging, although there remain differences in their respective focuses. The main merit of the WHO approach is its focus on performance and the systems approach towards health (care). The merit of the WB view is the integrated approach to health, education and poverty. It is argued that CEEC and NIS need to anticipate an ageing population and growing numbers of chronically ill. This calls for integrated health care systems and more integrated funding and payment systems. Conclusion: The recommendations provided in the WHR and the WDR with regard to integrated care and integrated financing remain rather abstract. Advisors of CEEC and NIS on health care reform and Western assistance projects should focus more on future needs, in order to avoid building health systems that consistently lag behind the needs of their populations.

Keywords: central and eastern Europe, epidemiological transition, health system reform

Received 6 November 2001. Accepted 31 May 2002.

* Correspondence: D.M.J. Delnoij, PhD, NIVEL, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands, tel. +31 30 2729847, e-mail: d.delnoij{at}nivel.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Global Health PromotionHome page
M. R. Pino Juste
Educacion para la salud con personas mayores: descripc de una experiencia
Global Health Promotion, September 1, 2008; 15(3): 58 - 62.
[PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.