© 2003 by European Journal of Public Health
Advancing a theoretical model for public health and health promotion indicator development
Proposal from the EUHPID consortium
Georg Bauer1,*, John Kenneth Davies2, Jurgen Pelikan3, Horst Noack4, Ursel Broesskamp5 and Chloe Hill6 on behalf of the EUHPID Consortium1 Department of Health and Intervention Research, Institute of Social and Preventative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 2 International Health Development Research Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Brighton, Falmer, Birghton, UK 3 Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for the Sociology of Health and Medicine, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 4 Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria 5 Health Promotion Switzerland, Bern, Switzerland 6 EUHPID Project Consortium, University of Brighton, Falmer, Brighton, UK
This paper discusses the work of the EUHPID Project to develop a European Health Promotion Monitoring System based on a common set of health promotion indicators. The Project has established three working groups to progress this task health promotion policy and practice-driven, data-driven and theory-driven. The work of the latter group is reviewed in particular. EUHPID has taken a systems theory approach in order to develop a model as a common frame of reference and a rational basis for the selection, organization and interpretation of health promotion indicators. After reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of those health promotion models currently proposed for indicator development, the paper proposes a general systems model of health development, and specific analytical, socio-ecological models related to public health and health promotion. These are described and discussed in detail. Taking the Ottawa Charter as the preferred framework for health promotion, the socio-ecological model for health promotion adopts its five action areas to form five types of systems. The structure and processes for each of these five systems are proposed to form the basis of a classification system for health promotion indicators. The paper goes on to illustrate such a system with reference to indicators in the workplace setting. The EUHPID Consortium suggest that their socio-ecological model could become a common reference point for the public health field generally, and offer an invitation to interested readers to contribute to this development.
Keywords: Europe, health promotion, indicators, public health, systems theory
* Correspondence: Georg Bauer, Dept. of Health and Intervention Research, Institute of Social and Preventative Medicine, University of Zurich, Sumatrastr 30, CH 8006 Zurich, Switzerland, e-mail: gfbauer{at}ifspm.unizh.ch
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Eriksson and B. Lindstrom A salutogenic interpretation of the Ottawa Charter Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2008; 23(2): 190 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Eriksson and B. Lindstrom Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and its relation with quality of life: a systematic review J. Epidemiol. Community Health, November 1, 2007; 61(11): 938 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bauer, J. K. Davies, J. Pelikan, and on behalf of the Euhpid Theory Working Group and T The EUHPID Health Development Model for the classification of public health indicators Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2006; 21(2): 153 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Ross, D. Heim, K. Flatley, J. B. Davies, and M. Sudbery An exploration of street drinking in Drumchapel, Scotland Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2005; 20(3): 314 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Groene Evaluating the progress of the Health Promoting Hospitals Initiative? A WHO perspective: Commentary on: Whitehead, D. (2004) The European Health Promoting Hospitals (HPH) project: how far on? Health Promotion International, 19, 259-267. Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2005; 20(2): 205 - 207. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


