© 2003 by European Journal of Public Health
European Union diabetes indicators
Fact or fiction?
C.E. de Beaufort1,*, A. Reunanen2, V. Raleigh3, F. Storms4, L. Kleinebreil5, R. Gallego6, C. Giorda7, K. Midthjell8, M. Jecht9, I. de Leeuw, E. Schober11, G. Boran12 and G. Tolis131 Clinique Pédiatrique Luxemburg, GDLuxemburg 2 National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland 3 Commission for Health Improvement, London, UK 4 MESOS Diabetes Centrum, Bilthoven, the Netherlands 5 Hopital G Pompidou, Paris, France 6 Ministry of Health, Lisbon, Portugal 7 Ospedale Maggiore, Chieri, Italy 8 The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Verdal, Norway 9 GK Havelhohe Med Klinik/Diabetologie, Berlin, Germany 10 University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium 11 University Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria 12 Adelaide and Health Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 13 Hippokratis General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Diabetes mellitus is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in EU/EFTA countries. Monitoring risk factors for diabetes and its complications will offer the possibility to evaluate the development in time as well as the influence of possible interventions. In this investigation a list with core and secondary indicators is proposed. Availability of these indicators and their data sources is discussed. An important variability of data sources is used in EU/EFTA countries, interfering with the comparability of the outcome. Further harmonisation as well as continuous evaluation of data sources will be necessary to provide reliable tools to monitor diabetes mellitus and its outcome on a routine basis.
Keywords: complications, diabetes mellitus, European Union, indicators
* Correspondence: Dr C.E. de Beaufort, Clinique Pédiatrique, 4 rue Barblé, 1210 Luxembourg, GD de Luxembourg, e-mail: debeaufort.carine{at}chl.lu
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F G Benavides Ill health, social protection, labour relations, and sickness absence. Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2006; 63(4): 228 - 229. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
