Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2003 13(Supplement 1):80-84; doi:10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.80
© 2003 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, D.M.
Right arrow Articles by Paget, W.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, D.M.
Right arrow Articles by Paget, W.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health monitoring in sentinel practice networks

The contribution of primary care

D.M. Fleming1,*, F.G. Schellevis2 and W.J. Paget2

1 Birmingham Research Unit, The Royal College of General Practitioners, Birmingham, UK 2 Nivel Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Background: The health monitoring programme of the European Commission has proposed a set of health indicators whereby the health status of member states can be measured. As part of that programme we considered how primary care might contribute relevant data. Methods: Using a questionnaire distributed to personal contacts and health authorities, we investigated the activities of sentinel practice networks and sought opinions on the place of primary care as a provider of information on health indicators. Studies on the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and on the incidence of chickenpox were undertaken within selected networks. Results: 33 networks were found who provided relevant information on a timely and continuing basis. Contributions varied; some were limited to monitoring influenza but others recorded morbidity data from every consultation. Recording methods ranged from the paper based to fully automated systems in which all morbidity was coded electronically at data entry. The study of diabetes mellitus showed less variation between national networks than currently suggested on the WHO database. For chickenpox we estimated the incidence of cases not presenting to general practitioners ranged between 3 and 27%. Conclusions: Information on health indicators needs to come from the place where relevant care is delivered; for many conditions that is from primary care. It can be delivered from appropriately resourced practices where the population is defined, the practice populations are nationally representative and data collection is automated.

Keywords: health indicators, sentinel practices, surveillance

* Correspondence: Dr D.M. Fleming, Birmingham Research Unit, The Royal College of General Practitioners, Lordswood House 54, Lordswood Road, Harborne, Birmingham B17 9 DB, UK, e-mail: dfleming{at}rcgpbhamresunit.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.