Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2004 14(2):194-198; doi:10.1093/eurpub/14.2.194
© 2004 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Droomers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mackenbach, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Droomers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mackenbach, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Smoking

Educational differences in the intention to stop smoking

Explanations based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour

Mariël Droomers1, Carola T.M. Schrijvers1 and Johan P. Mackenbach1

1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Background: At this time, the mechanisms by which socioeconomic differences in smoking develop are not completely understood. In this paper the Theory of Planned Behaviour as a potential explanatory framework for socioeconomic differences in smoking is tested. It was hypothesized that components of the Theory of Planned Behaviour may be unequally distributed over educational groups and therefore contribute to the explanation of socioeconomic differences in smoking. Educational differences in the intention to quit smoking are described and attempts are made to understand these in the light of educational patterns in attitude towards smoking cessation, perceived subjective norm concerning quitting smoking, and self-efficacy. Methods: This cross-sectional study was part of the longitudinal GLOBE study on socioeconomic differences in the Netherlands. Components of the Theory of Planned Behaviour were measured in 1997 among 602 Dutch daily smokers. Results: No educational differences in the intention to quit smoking were found. Persons with a more positive attitude towards smoking cessation and a high subjective norm significantly more often intended to quit smoking. But, positive attitude and high subjective norm were not related to education, which explains the lack of educational differences in intention to quit smoking. Higher educated respondents reported significantly higher self-efficacy to refrain from smoking, which, however, was not related to the intention to quit smoking. Conclusion: It is anticipated that, from all components of the Theory of Planned Behaviour, only the direct effect of self-efficacy on behaviour may contribute to educational differences in smoking cessation.

Keywords: educational level, self-efficacy, smoking, smoking cessation, Theory of Planned Behaviour

Received 22 July 2002. Accepted 9 January 2003.

* Correspondence: Mariël Droomers, PhD, Center for Prevention and Health Services Research, RIVM, Interne postbak 101, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands, tel. +31 30 2744558, fax +31 30 2744466, e-mail: mariel.droomers{at}rivm.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J Public HealthHome page
M. Leinsalu, M. Tekkel, and A. E. Kunst
Social determinants of ever initiating smoking differ from those of quitting: a cross-sectional study in Estonia
Eur J Public Health, December 1, 2007; 17(6): 572 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
S Gallus, A Schiaffino, C La Vecchia, J Townsend, and E Fernandez
Price and cigarette consumption in Europe.
Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 114 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.