Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on June 7, 2005
The European Journal of Public Health 2005 15(3):282-287; doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki082
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/3/282    most recent
cki082v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaix, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chauvin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaix, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chauvin, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Health Services Research

Access to general practitioner services: the disabled elderly lag behind in underserved areas

Basile Chaix1, Paul J. Veugelers2, Pierre-Yves Boëlle1 and Pierre Chauvin1

1 Research Unit in Epidemiology and Information Sciences, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM U), France
2 Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

Correspondence: Basile Chaix, INSERM U444, Faculté de Médecine Saint-Antoine, 27 rue Chaligny, 75571 Paris Cedex 12, France, tel. +33 1 44 73 84 43, fax +33 1 44 73 84 62, Email: chaix{at}u444.jussieu.fr

Background: Several studies have shown that people living in areas underserved in physicians have reduced odds of consulting. However, beyond the magnitude of this effect averaged for the whole population, policymakers need to know whether specific subgroups faced with transportation difficulties, such as the elderly and especially the disabled elderly, have a particularly restricted access to physicians when residing in underserved areas. Methods: The study sample, representative of the French population aged 18–75 in 1999, comprised 12 405 individuals. Multilevel Poisson models were used to investigate the impact of the area-level density of general practitioners (GPs) on the number of GP consultations reported over the previous 12 months. Results: The mean number of GP consultations over the previous 12 months was 3.8 (S.D.=4.9). Multivariate analyses indicated that living in areas underserved in GPs lead to a greater reduction in primary care utilization for the elderly, and especially for the disabled elderly, than for younger age groups. The disabled elderly had 244% more GP consultations (95% CI:+79%, +562%) when they lived in areas with high versus low GP density (defined with the 10th and 90th percentiles as cut-offs). Conclusion: If further research confirms our findings, this increasingly disturbing public health issue in industrialized countries where populations are ageing will require priority policy measures. Ensuring that elderly people living in underserved areas have adequate access to primary care may prevent future hospitalizations, use of home care services and institutionalization.

Keywords: access to care, frail elderly, geography of health, primary health care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. Pearce, K. Witten, R. Hiscock, and T. Blakely
Are socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods deprived of health-related community resources?
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 36(2): 348 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.