Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2005
The European Journal of Public Health 2005 15(4):355-360; doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/4/355    most recent
cki004v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coulter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkinson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coulter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkinson, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Health Services Research

European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers

Angela Coulter and Crispin Jenkinson*

* Picker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK

Correspondence: Angela Coulter, PhD, Picker Institute Europe, King's Mead House, Oxpens Road, Oxford OX1 1RX, UK, tel. +44 1865 208100, fax +44 1865 208101, Email: angela.coulter{at}pickereurope.ac.uk

Background: Responsiveness to patients is now seen as a key characteristic of effective health systems. This study aimed to learn more about European people's views on the responsiveness of their country's health systems and healthcare providers. Methods: Telephone survey with random samples of the populations in Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK using random digit dialling. Results: Responses were obtained from 8119 people aged 16 and over. Just over half the respondents said that doctors always listened carefully to them, gave them time for questions and provided clear explanations. Respondents from Switzerland and the UK reported consistently high rates of satisfaction with doctors' communication skills, while respondents from Poland were significantly less satisfied. Younger people were more critical than older people. Expectations of patient involvement in treatment decisions were high, particularly among younger people, with 74% indicating a desire to be actively involved. Most respondents felt they should have a choice of primary care doctor, specialist doctor and hospital, but less than half felt they had sufficient information to make an informed choice. There were significant variations between the countries in reported levels of involvement and in satisfaction with opportunities for choice. Conclusions: The results suggest that many European patients want a more autonomous role in health care decision-making. Policy-makers and clinicians should consider how to narrow the gap between public expectations and patients' experience.

Keywords: doctor–patient communication, choice, responsiveness, shared decision-making


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. C. Slade, E. Molloy, and J. L. Keating
`Listen to me, tell me': a qualitative study of partnership in care for people with non-specific chronic low back pain
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 270 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
O Groene, M J M H Lombarts, N Klazinga, J Alonso, A Thompson, and R Sunol
Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study)
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 18(Suppl_1): i44 - i50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. Stacey, R. Samant, and C. Bennett
Decision Making in Oncology: A Review of Patient Decision Aids to Support Patient Participation
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2008; 58(5): 293 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
B. Conner-Spady PhD, C. Sanmartin PhD, G. Johnston MD MBA, J. McGurran MSc, M. Kehler MA, and T. Noseworthy MD MPH
Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 12, 2008; 179(4): 327 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A Delgado, L Andres Lopez-Fernandez, J de Dios Luna, N Gil, M Jimenez, and A Puga
Patient expectations are not always the same
J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2008; 62(5): 427 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Coulter
What do patients and the public want from primary care?
BMJ, November 19, 2005; 331(7526): 1199 - 1201.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.