Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on April 6, 2006
The European Journal of Public Health 2006 16(5):505-508; doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/5/505    most recent
ckl041v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeGresley, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hurt, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LeGresley, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hurt, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Smoking

Movie Moguls: British American Tobacco's covert strategy to promote cigarettes in Eastern Europe{dagger}

Eric M. LeGresley1, Monique E. Muggli2 and Richard D. Hurt3

1 Tobacco Control Consultant, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Z 1C7
2 Contracted to Nicotine Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55105, USA
3 Nicotine Dependence Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Correspondence: Richard D. Hurt, Mayo Clinic, Nicotine Dependence Center, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA, tel: +1 507 266 1944, fax: +1 507 266 7900, e-mail: rhurt{at}mayo.edu

Background: Though the cigarette companies have long publicly denied paying for product placement in films, the documentary evidence from the 1950s-1980s overwhelmingly suggests otherwise. Methods: Approximately 800,000 pages of previously secret internal corporate British American Tobacco Company documents were reviewed at the Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository from March 2003 through May 2005. Documents were also searched online at the various tobacco document collections between February 2004 and November 2004. Results: A small collection of internal corporate documents from British American Tobacco show that in the late 1990s the company evaluated investing in a movie destined for Eastern Europe. By being an investor, BAT could influence the alteration of the movie script to promote BAT's brands, thus providing marketing opportunities without a clear violation of movie product placement restrictions. Conclusion: Future protocols to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control should seek to curtail more than just payment for tobacco product placement. More restrictive provisions will be needed to hinder creative strategies by the tobacco industry to continue tobacco promotion and trademark diversification through movies.

Keywords: British American Tobacco, smoking in movies, tobacco industry


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.