Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on May 3, 2006
The European Journal of Public Health 2006 16(5):513-519; doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/5/513    most recent
ckl048v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Smoking

Attitudes towards smoking policies and tobacco control measures in relation to smoking status and smoking behaviour

Anja Schumann, Ulrich John, J. René Thyrian, Sabina Ulbricht, Ulfert Hapke and Christian Meyer

Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Germany

Correspondence: Anja Schumann, PhD, Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Walther-Rathenau-Strasse 48, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany, tel: +49 3834 86 77 20, fax: +49 3834 86 77 01, e-mail: schumann{at}uni-greifswald.de

Background: To examine support for various smoking policies and tobacco control measures among lifetime smokers in a country with weak anti-smoking legislation and an underdeveloped anti-smoking climate. Methods: Current (n = 624) and former smokers (n = 131) from a general population survey filled in the 30-item Smoking Policy Index (SPI). Structural equation modelling was used to confirm the SPI factorial structure and to test whether smoking status and smoking behaviour variables were related to the six dimensions of the SPI. Results: The dimension with the highest support was penalties for sales to minors. Sanctions against smokers had the lowest support. Current smokers compared with former smokers showed lower support on the taxes/fees, public education, and environmental restrictions dimensions while controlling for gender, age, and social status. Within current smokers, unfavourable smoking behaviours were associated with lower support. Conclusion: Even in a country with poor tobacco control conditions, lifetime smokers including smokers with highly unfavourable smoking behaviours strongly support smoking policies and tobacco control measures concerning penalties and advertising/promotion. These measures should be used to promote anti-smoking legislation, and strict law enforcement of these measures is expected to be accepted by all smokers. For measures that are not supported by all lifetime smokers, interventions may be useful to increase acceptability. A limitation of the present study is the absence of never-smokers as a comparison group.

Keywords: anti-smoking legislation, smoking policy index, support


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
L Lazuras, J R Eiser, and A Rodafinos
Predicting smokers' non-compliance with smoking restrictions in public places
Tob. Control, April 1, 2009; 18(2): 127 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.