Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 1997 7(2):128-135; doi:10.1093/eurpub/7.2.128
© 1997 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ØVRETVEIT, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ØVRETVEIT, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Managing the gap between demand and publicly affordable health care in an ethical way

JOHN A. ØVRETVEIT

Dr John A. Øvretveit, Professor of Health Policy and Management, The Nordic School of Public Health, Box 12133, S-40242 Gothenburg. Sweden, tel. {boxplus}46 31 693923, fax {boxplus}46 31 691777

A major health policy challenge of the 1990s is to manage the gap between the demand for health care and our ability to pay for care and to do so in an ethical way. This paper describes European responses to the gap, which have been to do nothing, to do more with the same or less resources, to do more with more resources, to change behaviour and attitudes and to define health needs more narrowly. These responses have not reduced the gap and cannot prevent it from widening in the future. Rationing and prioritizing are other responses, which will have an increasingly important role. This paper proposes that the survival of public health care systems depends on recognizing and ‘managing’ the gaps and doing so in an ethical way. Conventional responses have ethical problems equal to or more serious than those involved in rationing and prioritizing. The paper proposes that rationing and prioritizing must become more central methods for managing the gap between resources and demand in the future, but that such approaches will need to be more explicit and ethical if they are to gain public support.

Keywords: ethics, rationing, prioritizing, health policy, needs


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
M Szeremeta, J. Dawson, D. Manning, A. R Watson, M. M Wright, W. Notcutt, and R. Lancaster
Snapshots of five clinical ethics committees in the UK
J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2001; 27(90001): i9 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Pencheon
Managing demand: Matching demand and supply fairly and efficiently
BMJ, May 30, 1998; 316(7145): 1665 - 1667.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.