Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 1997 7(2):182-187; doi:10.1093/eurpub/7.2.182
© 1997 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCAF-KLOMP, W.
Right arrow Articles by VAN DEN HEUVEL, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SCAF-KLOMP, W.
Right arrow Articles by VAN DEN HEUVEL, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

CANCER

Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening

Factors associated with reattendance for periodic breast screening

WINNIE SCAF-KLOMP, ERIC VAN SONDEREN and WIM VAN DEN HEUVEL

Northern Centre for Health Care Research, University of Groningen Groningen, The Netherlands

W. Scaf-Klomp, Northern Centre for Health Care Research, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands, tel {boxplus}31 50 3636374, fax {boxplus}31 50 3632406

The motives and reasons for regular attendance, irregular attendance and drop-out were studied in women who were enrolled in a biennial breast screening programme in 1975 and who were invited to each subsequent screening round until 1992. Three compliance groups were compared: ‘attended all rounds’ (group A, n=79), ‘missed 1 or 2 rounds’ (group B, n=73) and ‘missed more than 2 rounds’ (group C, n=64). The groups did not differ with respect to background variables such as sociodemographic characteristics, actual health problems or preventive health orientations, but significant differences were found in general attitudes to breast screening and to the organizational aspects of screening procedures. The results suggest that during the course of a screening programme, for a substantial group of not strongly motivated women, the recurring negative aspects of mammography (pain and anxiety) are increasingly becoming a burden. ‘Circumstantial factors’ like waiting for one's turn, the distance to the screening centre and incidental dissatisfaction with handling by screening staff, appear to trigger the decision to skip screening rounds or to drop out of the programme. From the perspective of maintaining a regular attendance throughout the programme this is an important group. Special efforts must be made to encourage these women to stay in the programme.

Keywords: reattendance, breast cancer, screening, mammography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.