Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 1998 8(2):113-118; doi:10.1093/eurpub/8.2.113
© 1998 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER WEIJDEN, T.
Right arrow Articles by KNOTTNERUS, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER WEIJDEN, T.
Right arrow Articles by KNOTTNERUS, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Barriers to working according to cholesterol guidelines

A randomized controlled trial on implementation of national guidelines in 20 general practices

TRUDY VAN DER WEIJDEN1, RICHARD P.T M. GROL1,2, BERNA J. SCHOUTEN1 and J. ANDRÉ KNOTTNERUS1

1Centre for Quality of Care Research, University Maastricht
2Centre for Quality of Care Research, University Nijmegen

Dr. Trudy van der Weijden, Centre for Quality of Care Research, Department of General Practice, University Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands, tel. +31 43 3882321, fax +31 43 3619344

Background: the objective was to test the feasibility of cholesterol guidelines for Dutch general practitioners (GPs). Knowledge and favourable attitudes are fundamental to the adoption of these guidelines and need to be optimized for the successful implementation of the guidelines. The effect of a programme designed to improve these basic requirements was assessed and the barriers to change were investigated. Methods: the cholesterol guidelines were distributed to 32 GPs in 20 general practices. The study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial with a six month intervention period. The programme for improvement consisted of group education, feedback on performance and face-to-face instruction on location. Results: the GPs increased their knowledge of the guidelines significantly after the educational session, but their score decreased to a lower level than the mean score of the control GPs at the follow-up. The level of agreement with the guidelines was already rather high at the baseline and remained comparable for both groups at the follow-up. The GPs' opinion of the feasibility of the guidelines, in contrast, was rather low at the baseline and remained low at the follow-up. Important barriers to change were the complexity of the guideline algorithm, the amount of time needed for this type of care, the difficulty in performing selective case finding and guidance of diet therapy. Conclusions: an intensive programme for improvement had hardly any impact on the basic requirements for adherence to the cholesterol guidelines. Both the validity of the guidelines and the opinion about the feasibility of the guidelines deserve more attention during the development of guidelines.

Keywords: cholesterol, feasibility studies, guidelines, primary health care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
W. N. KASJE, P. DENIG, and F. M. HAAIJER-RUSKAMP
Specialists' expectations regarding joint treatment guidelines for primary and secondary care
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2002; 14(6): 509 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
F. W. Siero, J. Broer, W. J. E. Bemelmans, and B. M. Meyboom-de Jong
Impact of group nutrition education and surplus value of Prochaska-based stage-matched information on health-related cognitions and on Mediterranean nutrition behavior
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2000; 15(5): 635 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.