Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 1998 8(4):299-304; doi:10.1093/eurpub/8.4.299
© 1998 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RANDHAWA, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RANDHAWA, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


INTERNATIONAL HEALTH

Procuring organs for transplantation

A European perspective

GURCH RANDHAWA*

*Mr. Gurch Randhawa, Lecturer in Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Care & Social Studies, University of Luton, Park Square, Luton LU1 3JU, England, tel. +44 1582 734111 Ext 2130, fax +44 1582 489358, e-mail: gurch.randhawa{at}luton.ac.uk

Background: The shortage of organs for transplant In Europe has been considerable for many years. A number of different policies have been implemented in an attempt to address this problem. These have had varying degrees of success from country to country. Methods: This article provides an up-to-date review of organ procurement policies throughout Europe. Alternative and In some cases controversial organ procurement programmes are also considered to establish whether the increasing demand for organs can be met elsewhere. Results: Transplant waiting lists are the greatest by far for those patients waiting for a kidney replacement. Norway has best managed to address this need through adopting a positive policy choice towards live donation whilst still maintaining an active cadaveric donation policy. Conclusion: With the lowering of both physical and social barriers In Europe, there has been a recent shift towards co-operation between some European countries in promoting transplant activity. This ensures that if an organ becomes available in one country and has no suitable recipient, then it can be used elsewhere. The future may show and increasing trend towards this level of European cooperation in order to make transplant activity more efficient.

Keywords: cooperation, donation, Europe, organs, policy, transplant


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJPHHome page
G. Siegal, N. Siegal, and R. J. Bonnie
An Account of Collective Actions in Public Health
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2009; 99(9): 1583 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
C. A. Zawistowski and M. A. DeVita
Non-Heartbeating Organ Donation: A Review
J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 189 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.