Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 1999 9(1):45-51; doi:10.1093/eurpub/9.1.45
© 1999 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAVE, M. L. T.
Right arrow Articles by BIJL, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HAVE, M. L. T.
Right arrow Articles by BIJL, R. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH

Inequalities in mental health care and social services utilisation by immigrant women

MARGREET L. TEN HAVE1, and ROB V. BIJL1

1Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Mrs. M. ten Have, Msc, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, P.O. Box 725, 3500 AS Utrecht, The Netherlands, tel. +31 30 2971100, fax +31 30 2971111, e-mail: mhave{at}trimbos.nl

Background: The basic assumption of public health policy for immigrants is that they ought to have equal access to health services compared to other population groups In Dutch society. However, little research is done on the actual use of mental health services by immigrants and literature seems to indicate inequalities in services utilisation by immigrant women. Methods: This study was conducted in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Data on service utilisation were drawn from patient registers and came from care providers who were asked to keep up registration for some time to count the number of immigrant women referred to and in treatment. Results: Surinamese, Antillean, Turkish and Moroccan women made considerably less use of mental health care services than native-born women. On the other hand, immigrant women more frequently used social work facilities and women crisis intervention centres. Overall, they consulted the latter organizations nearly 1.5 times more frequently than mental health care services. The differences in service utilisation between the four immigrant groups are also discussed. Conclusions: This study explores the reasons for the ethnic differences in service utilisation. It argues that cultural and supply factors are largely responsible for the ethnic differences in use of mental health services. The differential use of social services is mainly ascribed to the socioeconomic status of the women concerned. The results imply that a care policy may improve the accessibility of mental health services for immigrant women. The most promising measure is by employing more ethnic and bilingual care providers.

Keywords: ethnicity, mental health care, socioeconomic status, utilisation, women


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
A. Tiainen, G. Edman, L. Flyckt, G. Tomson, and C. Rehnberg
Regional variations and determinants of direct psychiatric costs in Sweden
Scand J Public Health, July 1, 2008; 36(5): 483 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
E. Scheppers, E. van Dongen, J. Dekker, J. Geertzen, and J. Dekker
Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: a review
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2006; 23(3): 325 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
E Robertson, M Malmstrom, J Sundquist, and S-E Johansson
Impact of country of birth on hospital admission for women of childbearing age in Sweden: a five year follow up study
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2003; 57(11): 877 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.