Skip Navigation



The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on July 8, 2009

The European Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp092
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/65    most recent
ckp092v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vermeer, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Seidell, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vermeer, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Seidell, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Value for money or making the healthy choice: the impact of proportional pricing on consumers’ portion size choices

Willemijn M. Vermeer, Esther Alting, Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis and Jacob C. Seidell

Institute for Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Willemijn Vermeer, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands, tel: +31 20 59 82797, fax: +31 20 59 86940, e-mail: willemijn.vermeer{at}falw.vu.nl

Received February 20, 2009 , accepted June 4, 2009

Background: Large food portion sizes are determinants of a high caloric intake, especially if they have been made attractive through value size pricing (i.e. lower unit prices for large than for small portion sizes). The purpose of the two questionnaire studies that are reported in this article was to assess the impact of proportional pricing (i.e. removing beneficial prices for large sizes) on people's portion size choices of high caloric food and drink items. Methods: Both studies employed an experimental design with a proportional pricing condition and a value size pricing condition. Study 1 was conducted in a fast food restaurant (N = 150) and study 2 in a worksite cafeteria (N = 141). Three different food products (i.e. soft drink, chicken nuggets in study 1 and a hot meal in study 2) with corresponding prices were displayed on pictures in the questionnaire. Outcome measures were consumers’ intended portion size choices. Results: No main effects of pricing were found. However, confronted with proportional pricing a trend was found for overweight fast food restaurant visitors being more likely to choose small portion sizes of chicken nuggets (OR = 4.31, P = 0.07) and less likely to choose large soft drink sizes (OR = 0.07, P = 0.04). Conclusion: Among a general public, proportional pricing did not reduce consumers’ size choices. However, pricing strategies can help overweight and obese consumers selecting appropriate portion sizes of soft drink and high caloric snacks. More research in realistic settings with actual behaviour as outcome measure is required.

Keywords: environmental interventions, food portion sizes, pricing strategies, obesity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.