Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2005 15(5):443-446; doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki172
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antó, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antó, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Viewpoint

The precautionary approach: from Birth to childhood Epidemiology for risk assessment: losing the beginner's confidence

Josep M. Antó*

* Respiratory and Environmental Health Research Unit, Municipal Institute of Medical Research (IMIM-IMAS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence: Josep M. Antó, Respiratory and Environmental Health Research Unit, Municipal Institute of Medical Research (IMIM-IMAS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain e-mail: jmantoa@imim.es

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Like most epidemiologists, I learned that epidemiological methods are particularly useful for providing background information for risk assessment as an important tool for health protection and something I had the opportunity to apply from the beginning. In the eighties, using daily observations of emergency room visits for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and applying Box–Jenkins models, we challenged that the usual air pollution standards at that time protected the health of the exposed populations with a margin of safety as intended.1 Although the publication of the paper was accompanied by a faultfinding editorial, subsequent research proved a wide replication of our results.2 The subsequent translation of the results of time-series studies into more stringent standards for air pollution has, in general, faced two contentious difficulties: the lack of a plausible biological explanation and the difficulties of translating the association between current low levels of air pollution and mortality into a population-based . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    The precautionary principle: a relevant new concept for risk assessment and health protection
 

    The precautionary approach: from birth to childhood
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?