Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2005
The European Journal of Public Health 2005 15(6):576-579; doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki068
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/6/576    most recent
cki068v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lobstein, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baur, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lobstein, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baur, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Obesity

Policies to prevent childhood obesity in the European Union

T. Lobstein1 and L. A. Baur2

1 Childhood Obesity Working Group of the International Obesity TaskForce (IOTF), London, UK
2 Childhood Obesity Working Group of IOTF, University of Sydney Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia

Correspondence: Tim Lobstein, Coordinator, Childhood Obesity Working Group of the International Obesity TaskForce (IOTF), 231 North Gower Street, London NW1 2NS, UK, tel: +44 20 7691 1900, e-mail: childhood{at}iotf.org

Received July 5, 2004, accepted November 3, 2004


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Prevention approaches
 Interested parties
 Conflict of interest
 References
 
The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity needs to be addressed. Without clear evidence to show which preventive interventions are most likely to work, a series of precautionary measures can be suggested. At a meeting of scientific experts organised by the International Obesity TaskForce and held at the European Congress on Obesity in May, 2004, a number of measures were proposed which follow the precautionary principle of promoting health while being unlikely to increase the risk of harm. The proposals are reported in the present paper.

Keywords: child, obesity, prevention, policies, expert opinion

Adramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents in the European Union (EU) has occurred in the last 20 years, particularly the last 10 years. Recent surveys,1 indicate that an estimated 18% of European school children (i.e. some 14 million children out of 77 million school children in the 25 EU member states) are overweight, with an annual rise in prevalence of between 0.55% and 1.65%, i.e. more than 400 000 new cases every year. Among the overweight children, at least 3 million are estimated to be obese, and their number is rising by more than 85 000 each year. [Overweight and obesity are defined according to the criteria for children recommended by the International Obesity TaskForce (IOTF),2 based on age- and gender-specific body mass index (BMI) cut-off points equivalent to adult BMIs of 25 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2, respectively.]

Overweight and obese children are at a raised risk of co-morbidities including type 2 diabetes, fatty liver disease, and endocrine and orthopaedic disorders.1 Overweight children enter adulthood with a raised risk of adult obesity of up to 17-fold (after adjusting for parental obesity),3 and adult obesity in turn carries an increased likelihood of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, certain cancers and a range of other disorders including psychiatric problems.4 Even if subsequent weight loss is achieved and maintained, there is evidence that mortality rates are higher among those adults who had been obese as adolescents.5


    Prevention approaches
 Top
 Abstract
 Prevention approaches
 Interested parties
 Conflict of interest
 References
 
If obesity could be effectively treated in childhood this might reduce subsequent disease risk and health service costs. However, effective treatment for the majority of obese children and adolescents remains elusive. Management protocols, involving behaviour modification, family support, and lifestyle change are difficult to put into practice and may require the input of multi-disciplinary professional teams.6 Lifestyle modification requires motivation and active participation by the family and young person and is a particular challenge as the child grows into adolescence. Yet obesity in adolescence is a major risk factor for adult obesity and its co-morbidities. There is an urgent need, therefore, to focus on obesity prevention.

The evidence base for effective prevention of child obesity is poor. A Cochrane systematic review conducted in 2001 found only 10 trials that were sufficiently large and of sufficient duration and quality to be included in the review,7 all of which involved children who were already overweight. Three out of the four long-term studies that combined dietary education and physical activity interventions resulted in no difference in their effect on overweight. In two studies of dietary education alone, a multimedia action strategy appeared to be effective but other strategies did not. The one long-term study that focussed on physical activity resulted in a slightly greater reduction in overweight in favour of the intervention group, as did two short-term studies of physical activity. The reviewers acknowledged the difficulties researchers face when attempting to control the relevant variables and to introduce the necessary preventive measures in a consistent, uniform manner in school or family settings.

Other literature reviews810 of European and North American papers have suggested that the chances of successful prevention at the community level are increased if measures are broad-based and well integrated into children's lives, such as:

  • healthy school policies involving school cafeterias, vending machines and snack bars, plentiful school-based physical activity classes and recess activities;
  • classroom health education linked to the school's food and activity practices;
  • links between school practice and home and community activities;
  • prolonged interventions rather than short-term ones, involving adults and children, at school and at home;
  • the involvement of all children, not just some, using techniques sensitive to the cultural, ethnic and gender characteristics of the children.
A review of interventions designed to encourage healthy eating patterns in children also suggested that a ‘whole school’ approach is better than a targeted or piecemeal intervention strategy, and that access and affordability issues need further research.11 A ‘whole school’ approach is one which integrates the various opportunities for health promotion in the school, including classroom teaching, physical activity sessions, canteen food choices and vending machine sales. It involves children, staff and parents, and can extend health promotion through school–family and school–community links.

Other investigators have suggested that hours spent watching television may be strongly associated with weight gain in childhood,1 although whether this is due to the concomitant sedentary behaviour, or a tendency to consume snack foods while watching television, or the effects of advertising of energy-dense foods during television programmes, is not clear.

Furthermore, television watching may be symptomatic of other factors which encourage weight gain but which are even harder to study in controlled trials. Interventions are needed which can manipulate, for example, the relative availability of different food products in local retailers, or the level of safety in streets or parks, which might affect play activities. There have been no trials of the effects of removing local fast food outlets, or the provision of safe cycling schemes for children, in terms of reducing the prevalence or risk of obesity. Environmental risk factors, or ‘obesogens’,12 and the societal forces that underpin them, such as growth in road traffic, urbanisation of populations or globalisation of food supplies,13 are not easily controlled for research purposes, although some natural variations can be exploited. These potential obesogens are widely distributed in the community, and affect the population at large. Policies concerning their appearance, modulation or removal are shaped at city, national or international level and involve interested parties, such as car users, fast food companies and advertising agencies.


    Interested parties
 Top
 Abstract
 Prevention approaches
 Interested parties
 Conflict of interest
 References
 
The differing views of the interested parties, or stakeholders, may lead to challenges to the scientific basis and strength of evidence underlying policy proposals. The absence of strong evidence for obesity and overweight prevention will undermine the political will to make changes in local or national policy to alter a child's environment. Policy-makers may find it hard to support policies which limit, for example, commercial freedom or personal choice, without having compelling evidence for the benefit of these policies. Until such evidence becomes available, precautionary activities need to be undertaken based on the best available evidence supported by a consensus of scientific opinion. In this respect, professional practitioners with expertise in child obesity and related health problems have a significant role to play.

An opportunity for the expression of expert opinion in a scientific context arose at the 13th European Congress on Obesity, held in Prague, Czech Republic (26–29 May 2004). In a workshop on childhood obesity prevention conducted by the International Obesity TaskForce and attended by 60 specialists from 17 countries and several international organisations, a series of proposals were made for action at various levels of government and by relevant non-governmental organizations (see table 1). These recommendations can be viewed as options for consideration, and reflect a precautionary approach to the problem of childhood overweight and obesity: namely, the recommendations are unlikely to raise the risk of further ill-health and are consistent with the promotion of health and well-being in the population.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Policies for preventing child obesity

 

    Conflict of interest
 Top
 Abstract
 Prevention approaches
 Interested parties
 Conflict of interest
 References
 
The workshop was open to any person attending the Congress, without entrance charge, and was not sponsored by any commercial interest. The costs of the workshop were met from core funds of the IOTF, a section of the International Association for the Study of Obesity (IASO) and a recognised collaborating agency of the World Health Organization. IOTF and IASO operate an ethical policy which restricts donations from corporate sponsors. Authors' conflicting interests: none declared.


Key points

  • Europe is experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of overweight and obese school children.
  • Treatment is not a viable option, targeted prevention is helpful but inadequate, thus public health interventions are urgently needed.
  • With good evidence of effectiveness unavailable, interventions must be based on expert opinion.
  • A meeting of international specialists have agreed a list of options for policy-makers.

 


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Prevention approaches
 Interested parties
 Conflict of interest
 References
 
1 Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R. Obesity in children and young people: A crisis in public health. Report to the World Health Organization by the International Obesity TaskForce. Obes Rev 2004;5 (Suppl 1): 5–104.

2 Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. Br Med J 2000;320:1240–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Hauner H. Transfer into adulthood. In: Kiess W, Marcus C, Wabitsch M, editors. Obesity in Childhood and Adolescence: Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine Vol 9. Basel: S Karger AG, 2004:219–28.

4 World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no 894. Geneva: WHO, 2000.

5 Must A, Jacques PF, Dallal GE, Bajema CJ, Dietz WH. Long-term morbidity and mortality of overweight adolescents. A follow-up of the Harvard Growth Study of 1922 to 1935. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1350–5.[Abstract]

6 Bauer B, Maffeis C. Interdisciplinary outpatient management. In: Burniat W, Cole T, Lissau I, Poskitt EME, editors. Child and Adolescent Obesity: Causes and Consequences; Prevention and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002:361–76.

7 Campbell K, Waters E, O'Meara S, Kelly S, Summerbell C. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev 2002;2:CD001871.

8 Micucci S, Thomas H, Vohra J. The Effectiveness of School-Based Strategies for the Primary Prevention of Obesity and for Promoting Physical Activity and/or Nutrition, the Major Modifiable Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of Reviews. Public Health Research, Education and Development Program, Effective Public Health Practice Project. Hamilton, Ontario: City of Hamilton, 2002 (http://www.hamilton.ca/phcs/ephpp/Research/Full-Reviews/Diabetes-Review.pdf, accessed 22 June 2004).

9 Lytle LA, Jacobs DR, Perry CL, Klepp K-I. Achieving physiological change in school-based intervention trials: what makes a preventive intervention successful? Br J Nutr 2002;88:219–21.[Medline]

10 Casey L, Crumley E. Addressing Childhood Obesity: The Evidence for Action. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres, 2004 (http://www.caphc.org/childhood_obesity/obesity_report.pdf, accessed 22 June 2004).

11 Shepherd J, Harden A, Rees R, et al. Young People and Healthy Eating: A systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. EPPI-Centre: London: EPPI-Centre, University of London, 2001 (http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWebContent/hp/reports/health_eating01/healthy_eating_yp.pdf, accessed 22 June 2004).

12 Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 1999;29:563–70.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

13 Kumanyika S, Jeffery RW, Morabia A, Rittenbaugh C, Antipatis VJ. Obesity prevention: the case for action. Int J Obes 2002;26:425–36.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/6/576    most recent
cki068v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lobstein, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baur, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lobstein, T.
Right arrow Articles by Baur, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?