Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2001 11(2):185-189; doi:10.1093/eurpub/11.2.185
© 2001 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NARDONE, A.
Right arrow Articles by HART, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NARDONE, A.
Right arrow Articles by HART, G. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


SEXUAL AND ADOLESCENT HEALTH

A comparison of high-risk sexual behaviour and HIV testing amongst a bar-going sample of homosexual men in London and Edinburgh

ANTHONY NARDONE1, JAMIE S. FRANKIS2, JULI P. DODDS1, PAUL N. FLOWERS2, DANIELLE E. MERCEY1 and GRANHAM J. HART2

1Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections, Royal Free and University College Medical School London, UK.
2MRS Social and Public Health Sciences, University of Glasgow Glasgow, UK.

Correspondence: Ki;oe Dodds, BSc, Department pf STD’s, Royal Free and Unversity College Meidcal School, Mortimer Market, London WC1E 6AU, United Kingdom, tel +44 207 380 9878, fax +44 207 380 9779

Background: This study compared high-risk sexual and HIV testing behaviour amongst homosexual men recruited from gay bars in London and Edinburgh. Methods: A cross-sectional survey monitoring high-risk sexual and HIV testing behaviour using a self-completed questionnaire was conducted in November and December 1996. Results: Two thousand, three hundred and ninety-seven questionnaires were returned (1,366 recruited in London and 1,031 in Edinburgh), with a response rate of 77%. A larger proportion of men surveyed in London had had unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) with one or more male partners in the previous year (35%) than in Edinburgh (30%). Men recruited in Edinburgh were less likely to have had an HIV test (54%) than men in London (63%). In both surveys, 25% of men who reported UAI with partners of the same HIV status as themselves also reported never having had an HIV test. Conclusions: The observed dissimilarities in the HIV epidemic in the two cities may be accounted for by the differences in self-reported high-risk sexual and HIV testing behaviours between the two populations. A large proportion of men in both cities continue to engage in high-risk sexual behaviour suggesting continued transmission of HIV in these populations. Thus, there is a continued need for innovative and relevant hearth promotion amongst homosexual men in the UK.

Keywords: HIV testing, homosexual men, risk factors, sexual behaviour, surveillance


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
I. G Stolte, J. B F de Wit, M. E Kolader, H. S A Fennema, R. A Coutinho, and N. H T M Dukers
Low HIV-testing rates among younger high-risk homosexual men in Amsterdam
Sex Transm Inf, August 1, 2007; 83(5): 387 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
C A McGarrigle, K A Fenton, O N Gill, G Hughes, D Morgan, and B Evans
Behavioural surveillance: the value of national coordination
Sex Transm Inf, December 1, 2002; 78(6): 398 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.