© 2001 by European Journal of Public Health
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH |
Private practice in Slovenia after the health care reform
IGOR
VAB1,*,
IRENA VATOVEC PROGAR2 and
MILJANA VEGNUTI1
1 Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia Ljubljana, Slovenia
2 Zdravstveni dom Postojna Postojna, Slovenia
* Igor vab, MD, PhD, Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Trubarjeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, tel +386 14 38 6915, fax +386 14 38 6910, e-mail: igorsvab{at}IVZ-rs.si
Background: Slovenia is one of the many post-socialist countries which started its reorientation of the health care system in the early 1990s. One of the aspects of the reform was the introduction of independent practice, which is performed either as a purely private practice on the basis of out of pocket payment or through contract with the National Health Insurance. A combination of both is also possible. In 1992 and 1993 the first physicians started to work in that way. The physicians that took this opportunity belonged to three main groups: dentists, primary health care physicians and secondary care specialists. The groups differ regarding their style of work and possibilities for running a profitable service. No studies have been done to evaluate the success of their decision. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the motives for leaving salaried posts, practice organization, perceived improvements and satisfaction with their choice of the practitioners who started to work independently in Slovenia in 1992 and 1993. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all self-employed physicians that started their independent practice in 1992 and 1993. A 54.5% response rate was achieved. The analysis of non-responders has shown that they did not differ significantly according to sex, location of practice, speciality or method of payment, from the responders. Results: The analysis shows that the reported reasons for choosing independent practice are not different across the groups. Possibility for greater income was not reported as a major reason for leaving public service. There are important differences in organization of work: general practitioners reported spending more time on patient contacts and administration than the other two groups; they also work exclusively for the National Health Insurance, which is not the case for the other two groups. The perceived areas of improvement differ substantially. Regardless, the overall satisfaction with their choice is high (over 90% would make the same decision again), the general practitioners are the most dissatisfied group. Conclusions: The analysis shows that self-employed physicians in Slovenia represent three different groups with different positions regarding how they earn their money. Their expectations have largely been met, since they claim that the doctor/patient relationship is better, as well as some conditions for the patients. A follow-up study that would take into account the long-term effects of privatization, an analysis of economic functioning and patient satisfaction would be necessary in order to verify these claims.
Keywords: Eastern Europe, family medicine, health care reform, primary health care, organisation, dental care, Slovenia
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Seifert, I. Svab, T. Madis, J. Kersnik, A. Windak, A. Steflova, and S. Byma Perspectives of family medicine in Central and Eastern Europe Fam. Pract., April 1, 2008; 25(2): 113 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Albreht, D. M. J. Delnoij, and N. Klazinga Changes in primary health care centres over the transition period in Slovenia Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2006; 16(3): 237 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|