Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2004 14(4):406-412; doi:10.1093/eurpub/14.4.406
© 2004 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krokstad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Westin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krokstad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Westin, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Sickness absence and work disability

The importance of social characteristics of communities for the medically based disability pension

Steinar Krokstad1,*, Per Magnus2, Anders Skrondal2 and Steinar Westin1

1 Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2 The Norwegian Institute of Public Health

Background: The aim of this study was to look for any possible contextual effect of deprivation at municipality level on the risk of being granted the medically based disability pension, controlled for compositional effects due to spatial concentration of people with a high risk of disability. Methods: The material consists of the residentiary part of a total Norwegian county population aged 20–54 years without disability pension at baseline, n=40,083. This study was performed as a 10-year follow-up study. The relative risk of being granted a disability pension was estimated by logistic regression analyses as odds ratios (OR) between people living in different municipalities according to a municipality deprivation index at three levels, adjusted for individual factors. Results: The OR of disability pension was 1.36 (1.22, 1.51) for people residing in intermediate deprived municipalities and 1.48 (1.31, 1.67) for people residing in the most deprived municipalities compared to the most affluent municipalities, adjusted for gender and age. After adjustment for individual risk factors the OR was 1.26 (1.12, 1.41) and 1.18 (1.04, 1.35) respectively. Analyses stratified by gender showed that the increased risk of receiving a disability pension for men in the most deprived municipalities was explained by individual factors alone. Conclusion: Relative municipality deprivation seems to account for an increase in the incidence of disability pension. This effect contributes to marginalization of people living in less affluent areas out of employment and thus to widening socioeconomic inequalities in the population.

Keywords: cohort study, disability pension, ecology, multilevel analysis, psychosocial deprivation, social epidemiology


Received 10 September 2002. Accepted 23 June 2003.

* Correspondence: Steinar Krokstad, MD, PhD, HUNT Research Centre, Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Neptunveien 1, 7650 Verdal, Norway, tel. +47 74075180, fax +47 74075181, e-mail: steinar.krokstad{at}medisin.ntnu.no


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
U. Christensen, M. Kriegbaum, C. O. Hougaard, O. S. Mortensen, and F. Diderichsen
Contextual factors and social consequences of incident disease
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2008; 18(5): 454 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.