Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2004 14(4):413-416; doi:10.1093/eurpub/14.4.413
© 2004 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Sickness absence and work disability

A comparison of socio-economic differences in long-term sickness absence in a Japanese cohort and a British cohort of employed men

Yuko Morikawa1,*, Pekka Martikainen2,3, Jenny Head3, Michael Marmot3, Masao Ishizaki4 and Hideaki Nakagawa1

1 Department of Public Health, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa, Japan, 2 Population Research Unit, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Finland, 3 International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London, UK, 4 Department of Hygiene, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa, Japan

Objectives: To compare the magnitude of socio-economic differences in sickness absence rates between a Japanese cohort and a British cohort. To assess the effects of self-rated health and behavioural risk factors on sickness absence in the two cohorts, and whether they explain socio-economic differences in sickness absence within and between cohorts. Methods: An 8 year follow up study of sickness absence in 2504 Japanese male employees in a factory in Japan and 6290 British male employees in civil service departments in London. The rates of first occurrences of long-term (>7 calendar days) sickness absence were determined and compared between these cohorts. Socio-economic status was measured with hierarchical employment grades. Results: The first time sickness absence rates were about two times higher among British men as compared with Japanese men. The rate ratio of lower to higher employment grade was 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1 among Japanese white-collar, Japanese blue-collar and British white-collar employees respectively. Baseline self-rated health and smoking habit predicted sickness absence in both cohorts. After adjusting for these factors a significant difference between the Japanese and British cohorts, and between employment grades remained. Conclusions: The rate of long-term sickness absence was higher in the British cohort than the Japanese cohort.

Keywords: comparative study, sickness absence, socio-economic status


Received 23 May 2002. Accepted 23 June 2003.

* Correspondence: Yuko Morikawa, PhD, Department of Public Health, Kanazawa Medical University, 1–1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa, 920–0293, Japan, tel. +81 (0)76 286 2211, fax +81 (0)76 286 3728, e-mail: ymjr{at}kanazawa-med.ac.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.