Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 2005 15(1):33-38; doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki108
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Josseran, L.
Right arrow Articles by Brücker, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Josseran, L.
Right arrow Articles by Brücker, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, © European Public Health Association 2005; all rights reserved

Smoking by French general practitioners: behaviour, attitudes and practice

Loïc Josseran1, Gary King2, Phillippe Guilbert3, Jovan Davis4 and Gilles Brücker1

1 Service de Santé Publique, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, 47-83 bvd de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France, Institut de Veilk Sanitaire, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, 94415 Saint Maurice cedex, France
2 Department of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16801, USA
3 Institut National de Prévention et d'Education pour la Santé, 42 bvd de la Libération 93200 Sint Denis cedex, France
4 Department of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University

Correspondence: Loïc Josseran, Institute de Veille Sanitaire, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, 94415 Saint Maurice cedex, France, tel. +33 1 41 79 68 48, fax +33 1 41 79 68 65, Email: l.josseran{at}invs.sante.fr

Introduction: This paper examines smoking prevalence, sociodemographic factors and the medical practice of French general practitioners. Method: Data from the 1998 cross-sectional national survey of 2,073 GPs. The questionnaire was administered by telephone. A response rate of 67% was attained. Instrumentation included questions about medical practice, sociodemographic characteristics, and health behaviour. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression (MLR) analyses were conducted. Results: Almost one-third (32.1%) of physicians were current smokers. A significantly higher proportion of male (33.9%) were smokers compared to women (25.4%, p<0.001) and men were more likely to be former smokers (49.1% versus 31.7%). Two-thirds of physicians reported recommending nicotine replacement therapy to their patients. MLR shown that former smokers were more likely (OR = 1.51, 95% CI, 1.24–1.83) to indicate that their help in getting patients to quit was not effective compared to smokers. Also, physicians who were ‘dissatisfied’ with the profession were more likely (OR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.60–0.92) to report their help as not effective than those who were ‘satisfied’. Conclusion: These data support the need for greater professional participation in reducing smoking among general practitioners in France and greater education concerning the vital role of physicians in promoting cessation among the general population.

Key points

  • This study examines smoking habits among French GP's, intervention practices, and opinions about their ability to help patients quit smoking.
  • This study found a smoking prevalence rate of 32.1%, 33.9% of male physicians were smokers and 25.4% of women.
  • This study found a smoking prevalence rate of 32.1%, 33.9% of male physicians were smokers and 25.4% of women.

Keywords: family physicians, smoking, tobacco


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.