The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2005
The European Journal of Public Health 2006 16(4):346-353; doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki157
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Inequalities |
Evaluating the effect of policies and interventions to address inequalities in health: lessons from a Dutch programme
Karien Stronks1 and Johan P. Mackenbach2
1 Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Centre/University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Dr K. Stronks, Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Centre/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, tel: +31 20 5664892, fax: +31 20 6972316, e-mail: k.stronks{at}amc.uva.nl
Objectives: Many initiatives have been taken in European countries that are designed to reduce inequalities in health. However, the effects of only a very few of these initiatives have been assessed. The main aim of a Dutch research and development programme was to systematically investigate and evaluate interventions aimed at reducing inequalities in health. In this paper, we report on this investigation, and draw lessons from the methodology used to evaluate such interventions. Approach: The programme included 12 evaluation studies, focusing on the wider determinants of inequalities in health (n = 2), behavioural determinants (n = 4), working conditions (n = 3) and health care (n = 3). Results: An experimental design was applied in two evaluation studies. The studies provided evidence of a positive effect. A quasi-experimental design appeared to be the only attainable option in seven studies. Five of these provided sufficient evidence for a positive effect, but two interventions appeared not to be successful. In three studies, no experimental or quasi-experimental design could be applied. Conclusions: The programme showed that it is possible to apply experimental or quasi-experimental studies to complex public health interventions. The Programme Committee steering the programme considered that the evidence generated by the experimental and quasi-experimental studies justified the implementation of the interventions on a wider scale, accompanied by further evaluation studies. Further development of the methodology of public health interventions is necessary. These include non-experimental designs such as international comparisons and time trend studies, especially in order to be able to evaluate broader policy measures.
Keywords: evaluation studies, health, socioeconomic status
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Havas, H. Bosma, C. Spreeuwenberg, and F. J. Feron Mental health problems of Dutch adolescents: the association with adolescents' and their parents' educational level Eur J Public Health, November 3, 2009; (2009) ckp172v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Bambra Changing the world? Reflections on the interface between social science, epidemiology and public health J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2009; 63(11): 867 - 868. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Lang, M. Kaminski, and A. Leclerc Report of the WHO commission on social determinants of health: a French perspective Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 19(2): 133 - 135. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|