The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on January 9, 2007
The European Journal of Public Health 2007 17(5):526-531; doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl267
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous |
Introducing Health Impact Assessment: an analysis of political and administrative intersectoral working methods
L.N. Mannheimer1, G. Gulis2, J. Lehto3 and P. Östlin4,*
1 School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Finland and Karolinska Institute, Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm
2 University of Southern Denmark, Unit of Health Promotion Research, Esbjerg Denmark and Trnava University, Department of Public Health, Trnava, Slovak Republic
3 School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Finland
4 Karolinska Institutet, Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
*Correspondence: Louise Nilunger Mannheimer, MPH, PhD-student, Tampere University, Department of Public Health, Tampere, Finland, tel.: +46 70 715 8638, e-mail: louise.nilunger.mannheimer{at}ipm.ki.se
Received September 1, 2006 , accepted November 12, 2006
Background: Intersectoral Action for Health (IAH) and its Health Impact Assessment (HIA) tool are built on collaboration between actors and sectors, requiring multidimensional and horizontal way of working. The study aims to analyse the enablers and barriers when such a new way of working and tool have been initiated to replace a traditional, vertical operation at the local level in Slovakia—a country in transition—in 2004. Methods: Up to date, there are few studies that have analysed intersectoral initiatives in relation to politics. In this study the conceptual framework of Kingdon has been used by which the actual problems, the governmental actions (or non-actions) (politics) and the understanding, implementation and evaluation of the initiative (policy) could be analysed. All actors involved, civil servants, politicians, representatives of the local public health institute and researchers, were interviewed and made to answer a questionnaire. Results: The results showed that there were a number of factors behind the initiation of HIA, which either delayed or accelerated the process. The problems identified were e.g. the prevailing traditional health care focus and the deteriorating health status of the population. There was a lack of multi-intersectoral knowledge, co-operation and function between sectors and actors. Enablers on the other hand were the membership of international organizations which called for new solutions, and the strong political commitment and belief that intersectorality would have a positive effect on health. Conclusion: The actors on the local level would have the capacity to work intersectorally to bring about policy change if HIA was to be more supported/institutionalized.
Keywords: intersectoral action for health, Health Impact Assessment, health policy, policy and implementation analysis
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Guldbrandsson and B. Fossum An exploration of the theoretical concepts policy windows and policy entrepreneurs at the Swedish public health arena Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2009; 24(4): 434 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Manandhar, M. Maimbolwa, E. Muulu, M. M. Mulenga, and D. O'Donovan Intersectoral debate on social research strengthens alliances, advocacy and action for maternal survival in Zambia Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2009; 24(1): 58 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|