Skip Navigation


The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access originally published online on November 5, 2008
The European Journal of Public Health 2009 19(1):65-68; doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn106
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/1/65    most recent
ckn106v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kabir, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Koh, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kabir, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Koh, H. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Infant, Child and Adolescent Health

Declining maternal smoking prevalence did not change low birthweight prevalence in Massachusetts from 1989 to 2004

Zubair Kabir1,2, Gregory N. Connolly1, Luke Clancy2, Bruce B. Cohen3 and Howard K. Koh1

1 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
2 Research Institute for a Tobacco Free Society, Dublin, Ireland
3 Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, USA

Correspondence: Zubair Kabir, The Research Institute for a Tobacco Free Society, The Digital Depot, Thomas Street, Dublin 8, Ireland, tel: +353-1-489-3638, fax: +353-1-489-3640, e-mail: zkabir{at}hsph.harvard.edu; zkabir{at}tri.ie

Received February 1, 2008 , accepted October 10, 2008

Background: Maternal smoking is associated with low birthweight (LBW). LBW prevalence is increasing in the US. However, it is unclear whether a fall in maternal smoking has any impact on the LBW prevalence in Massachusetts, a state with a comprehensive tobacco control program since 1993. Methods: Temporal patterns in prenatal maternal smoking and in LBW prevalence were quantified between 1989 and 2004, using Massachusetts Community Health Information Profile database. Yearly population-attributable-risk (PAR %) of singleton LBW live-births among pregnant smoking mothers were estimated based on a summary relative risk. The expected number of LBW babies attributable to reductions in maternal smoking in 2004 relative to 1989 was compared to the actual number of LBW babies in 2004. Results: Of 88 929 and 74 554 singleton live-births, 4297 and 4004 LBW births occurred in 1989 and 2004, respectively. Between 1989 and 2004, maternal smoking prevalence significantly declined yearly by ≥6% (from 19.9% to 6.8%) but overall LBW prevalence increased yearly by <1% (from 4.8% to 5.4%), with a significant yearly increase (<1%) in moderately LBW (1500–2499 g) prevalence. Yearly PAR % declined from 20.3% (n = 872) to 8.0% (n = 320), with an expected total of 3745 [4297 – (872 – 320)] LBW babies in 2004 relative to 1989. However, actual LBW babies numbered 4004 in 2004. The 259 above predicted (4004 – 3745) LBW babies born in 2004 being attributed to factors other than prenatal maternal smoking. Conclusions: Massachusetts experienced a decline in prenatal maternal smoking prevalence, but an increase in moderately LBW prevalence has offset the potential gains apparently achieved due to reductions in maternal smoking prevalence.

Keywords: low birthweight, Massachusetts, pregnancy, smoking


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.