Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 1996 6(3):218-226; doi:10.1093/eurpub/6.3.218
© 1996 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GEPKENS, A.
Right arrow Articles by GUNNING-SCHEPERS, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GEPKENS, A.
Right arrow Articles by GUNNING-SCHEPERS, L. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


REVIEW ARTICLE

Interventions to reduce socioeconomic health differences

A review of the international literature

ANNEMIEKE GEPKENS and LOUISE J. GUNNING-SCHEPERS

Acedemic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Institute of Social Medicine Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Annemieke Gepkens, University of Amsterdam, Institute of Social Medicine, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, tel. +31 20 5664892, fax +31 20 6972316

The objective of this study was to review information on evaluated interventions to reduce socioeconomic health differences (SEHD) and analyse studies to identify possible conditions for success. The analysed interventions were from published and unpublished sources. They were evaluated in terms of socioeconomic health outcomes. Ninety-eight publications on actual interventions to reduce SEHD and 31 so-called ‘grey literature’ interventions were identified. Many of the interventions described are reported to be effective. Many of the local experimental interventions, however, were not formally evaluated. Structural measures appear to be effective most often, but cannot be taken to affect all determinants. Interventions often Involve health education. This, however, only appears to be successful if providing information is combined with personal support or structural measures. Many very creative interventions to reduce SEHD have been reported. Several appear to be effective, but all address only a small aspect of health inequalities. Regrettably the lack of standardized measures and a common methodology hamper our ability to integrate and compare the results. However, all the studies show that there is room for improvement in our existing health policies to reach everyone in our population to the same degree of effectiveness.

Keywords: socioeconomic health differences, interventions, evaluation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
C. Wang, A. Guttmann, T. To, and P. T. Dick
Neighborhood Income and Health Outcomes in Infants: How Do Those With Complex Chronic Conditions Fare?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2009; 163(7): 608 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Global Health PromotionHome page
V. Ridde
Reducing social inequalities in health: public health, community health or health promotion?
Global Health Promotion, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 63 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
K. Stronks and J. P. Mackenbach
Evaluating the effect of policies and interventions to address inequalities in health: lessons from a Dutch programme
Eur J Public Health, August 1, 2006; 16(4): 346 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
L. Rychetnik and M. Wise
Advocating evidence-based health promotion: reflections and a way forward
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2004; 19(2): 247 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
K. Stronks
Generating evidence on interventions to reduce inequalities in health: the Dutch case
Scand J Public Health, September 1, 2002; 30(59_suppl): 20 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
J. N. Lavis, M. S. R. Farrant, and G. L. Stoddart
Barriers to employment-related healthy public policy in Canada
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2001; 16(1): 9 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A. Woodward and I. Kawachi
Why reduce health inequalities?
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2000; 54(12): 923 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Global Health PromotionHome page
J. N. Fortuin
Equity in health
Global Health Promotion, December 1, 1998; 5(3-4): 13 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Global Health PromotionHome page
D. Yach, M. S. Jensen, A. Norris, and T. Evans
Promoting Equity in Health
Global Health Promotion, June 1, 1998; 5(2): 7 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.