Skip Navigation

The European Journal of Public Health 1998 8(4):319-324; doi:10.1093/eurpub/8.4.319
© 1998 by European Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MANDERBACKA, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MANDERBACKA, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


METHODS

How do respondents understand survey questions on ill-health?

KRISTIINA MANDERBACKA*

*K Manderbacka, PhD, Department of Public Health, P.O. Box 41, 00014 University of Helsinkl, Finland, tel +358 9 191 27542, fax +358 9 191 27540, e-mail: kristilna.manderbacka{at}heWnki.fi

Survey research examining the prevalence of ill-health frequently use global single-item questions such as on long-standing Illness often combined with an inquiry about the consequences of Ill-health in everyday life. These kinds of questions appear to tap a response with face validity and comparability. However, a survey Interview Is also an interactional event and the way the respondents understand the meaning of questions is important. The purpose of this study is to explore how the meaning of survey questions on long-standing illness and restrictions posed by it are understood by respondents. Qualitative Interview data collected from a subgroup of 42 participants in a nation wide 1994 Finnish Survey on Living Conditions is used. This study Is based on qualitative content analysis of verbatim transcripts of these semi-structured interviews. Two relevant aspects of ill-health were distinguished: ‘disease’ and ‘illness’. Only medically diagnosed chronic diseases were considered long-standing illnesses by the respondents. Experienced, non-diagnosed illnesses were, rather, considered ‘normal’, i.e. consequences of ageing or the life situation or too insignificant to be considered long-standing illnesses. Whether long-standing illness was assessed as restricting everyday life was relative not only to the severity of the disease and the life situation of the respondents but also to adaptation to Ill-health. The results suggest that the survey question on long-standing Illness captures people's sense of chronic disease rather than the ‘illness, infirmity or disability’ the wording of the question suggests.

Keywords: limiting long-standing illness, long-standing illness, survey methods


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
H. Reiso, J. F. Nygard, S. Brage, P. Gulbrandsen, and G. Tellnes
Work ability and duration of certified sickness absence
Scand J Public Health, July 1, 2001; 29(3): 218 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
K. Manderbacka, E. Lahelma, and O. Rahkonen
Structural changes and social inequalities in health in Finland, 1986- 1994
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2001; 29(55_suppl): 41 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.