© 1999 by European Journal of Public Health
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH |
Infertility and subfecundity in population-based samples from Denmark, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain
WILFRIED KARMAUS, SVEND JUUL and ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN INFERTILITY AND SUBFECUNDITY STUDY GROUP
1 Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University USA
2 Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Aarhus University Denmark
Correspondence: Wilfried Karmaus, MD, MPH, Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, 4660 S. Hagadom Rd, Suite 600, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA, e-mail: Karmaus{at}msu.edu
Background: No uniform data which give basic Information on the societal burden of infertility and subfecundity exists in Europe. Methods: In a population-based survey the prevalence of subfecundity was ascertained by means of a standardized interview with women in Denmark, Germany, Poland, Italy and Spain. The time of unprotected intercourse (TUI) either leading or not leading to pregnancy was applied as a uniform measure of fecundity. Population-based samples of women 25–44 years of age were recruited. Results: Altogether 6,630 women participated in the study. With regard to the first pregnancy, 19% of all couples had a TUI of more than 12 months, which is within the range of most previous findings. Regarding the most recent and first TUI in individual lives, if it had occurred within previous 5 years, 23.4% overall did not conceive within 12 months (in Poland 33.3%, in north Italy and Germany 26.2%, in Denmark 23.3%, in Spain 18.6% and in south Italy 14.8%). Secondary subfecundity was more prevalent in Poland. When stratifying for planning of a pregnancy, the differences between countries diminished, particularly for the most recent TUI. However, the pattern of a higher prevalence of subfecundity in Poland, north Italy, Denmark and Germany and a lower prevalence (<20%) in Spain and south italy remains. Conclusions: Important differences in the prevalence of subfecundity exist between the six European regions investigated. Comparisons should first consider TUIs or planned TUIs to reduce the impact of distorting factors, which are mainly due to differing cultures of family planning in Europe.
Keywords: birth control, infertility, planned pregnancy, subfecundity, time to pregnancy
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Joffe, S. Paranjothy, H. Fielder, R. Lyons, and S. Palmer Use of time to pregnancy in environmental epidemiology and surveillance J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2008; 30(2): 178 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Boivin, L. Bunting, J. A. Collins, and K. G. Nygren International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1506 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N Mageroy, O J Mollerlokken, T Riise, V Koefoed, and B E Moen A higher risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of personnel who served aboard a Norwegian missile torpedo boat Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2006; 63(2): 92 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Joffe, J. Key, N. Best, N. Keiding, T. Scheike, and T. K. Jensen Studying Time to Pregnancy by Use of a Retrospective Design Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2005; 162(2): 115 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. K. Jensen, M. Joffe, T. Scheike, A. Skytthe, D. Gaist, and K. Christensen Time trends in waiting time to pregnancy among Danish twins Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 955 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. V. Younglai, A. C. Holloway, and W. G. Foster Environmental and occupational factors affecting fertility and IVF success Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 43 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Obi-Osius, B Misselwitz, W Karmaus, and J Witten Twin frequency and industrial pollution in different regions of Hesse, Germany Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2004; 61(6): 482 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Joffe Infertility and environmental pollutants Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2003; 68(1): 47 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-L.B. Dick, C.J. Bain, D.M. Purdie, V. Siskind, D. Molloy, and A.C. Green Self-reported difficulty in conceiving as a measure of infertility Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2711 - 2717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Joffe Invited Commentary: The Potential for Monitoring of Fecundity and the Remaining Challenges Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2003; 157(2): 89 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.K. Jensen, R. Slama, B. Ducot, J. Suominen, E.H.H. Cawood, A.G. Andersen, F. Eustache, S. Irvine, S. Auger, P. Jouannet, et al. Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2697 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Basso, S. Juul, and J. Olsen Time to pregnancy as a correlate of fecundity: differential persistence in trying to become pregnant as a source of bias Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2000; 29(5): 856 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|