Skip Navigation



The European Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on September 8, 2005

The European Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki146
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/5/448    most recent
cki146v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ginnelly, L.
Right arrow Articles by Diguseppi, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ginnelly, L.
Right arrow Articles by Diguseppi, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Article

Determining the cost effectiveness of a smoke alarm give-away program using data from a randomized controlled trial

Laura Ginnelly 1*, Mark Sculpher 1, Chris Bojke 1, Ian Roberts 2, Angie Wade 3, and Carolyn Diguseppi 4

1 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
2 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
3 Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
4 Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Laura Ginnelly, E-mail: lg116{at}york.ac.uk


   Abstract

Background: In 2001, 486 deaths and 17 300 injuries occurred in domestic fires in the UK. Domestic fires represent a significant cost to the UK economy, with the value of property loss alone estimated at £375 million in 1999. In 2001 in the US, there were 383 500 home fires, resulting in 3110 deaths, 15 200 injuries and $5.5 billion in direct property damage. Methods: A cluster RCT was conducted to determine whether a smoke alarm give-away program, directed to an inner-city UK population, is effective and cost-effective in reducing the risk of fire-related deaths/injuries. Forty areas were randomized to the giveaway or control group. The number of injuries/deaths and the number of fires in each ward were collected prospectively. Cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken to relate the number of deaths/injuries to resource use (damage, fire service, healthcare and giveaway costs). Analytical methods were used which reflected the characteristics of the trial data including the cluster design of the trial and a large number of zero costs and effects. Results: The mean cost for a household in a give-away ward, including the cost of the program, was £12.76, compared to £10.74 for the control ward. The total mean number of deaths and injuries was greater in the intervention wards then the control wards, 6.45 and 5.17. When an injury/death avoided is valued at £1000, a smoke alarm give-away has a probability of being cost effective of 0.15. Conclusions: A smoke alarm give-away program, as administered in the trial, is unlikely to represent a cost-effective use of resources.

Keywords: cluster-randomized trial; cost effectiveness analysis; smoke alarm give-away program.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.