Abstract

Background: Manual workers in the public sector have previously been found to be at risk of mental sickness absence (SA). As the impact of mental illness differs across economic sectors, this study investigated mental SA in the industrial sector, differentiating between office and production workers. Methods: Ten-year observational cohort study including 14 369 (8164 production and 6205 office) workers with a total of 101 118 person years. SA data were retrieved from an occupational health register. Mental SA episodes were medically certified as emotional disturbances [10th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10 R45)] or mental and behavioural disorders (ICD-10 F00–F99). The first mental SA episode since baseline was called index mental SA. Recurrences were defined as any mental SA episode occurring >28 days after recovery from index mental SA. Results: The incidence of mental SA was higher in production workers than in office workers, but office workers needed longer time to recover from mental SA. Mental SA recurred as frequently in production workers as in office workers. The median time to recurrence was 15.9 months and tangibly shorter in office workers (14.9 months) than in production workers (16.7 months). Production and office workers aged >55 years were at increased risk of recurrent mental SA within 12 months of recovery from index mental SA. Conclusions: The incidence of mental SA was higher in production workers than in office workers, whereas recurrence rates did not differ between them. Occupational health providers should pay special attention to older workers as they are at increased risk of recurrent mental SA.

Introduction

Mental disorders are common in the general population 1,2 and a major cause of sickness absence (SA) and disability pensioning. 3 Neurotic disorders and mood disorders are a greater burden to SA and disability benefits than specific psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and personality disorders. 4 In the Netherlands, emotional, neurotic and mood disorders are the most common causes of mental SA. 5 Of Dutch workers with emotional disorders, 95% were found to have returned to work within 1 year of reporting sick as compared with 89% of workers with neurotic disorders and 70% of workers with mood disorders. In the Finnish public sector, workers sick listed with adjustment disorders were most likely to resume work: 93% of them returned to work within 1 year of reporting sick, followed by anxiety disorders (76%) and mood disorders (63%). 6 Workers of high socio-economic position (SEP) were more likely to return to work than low SEP workers. High SEP workers may receive better treatment, 7 experience more social support and have more possibilities to accommodate work to their condition. In addition, comorbid physical and mental disorders, which are associated with longer SA duration, are less common among high SEP workers. 8

Although knowledge about return to work after mental SA is increasing, little is known about the recurrence of mental SA. Koopmans et al. 9 reported that after a first mental SA episode, workers had a three times higher risk of mental SA than the working population. Mental SA recurrence rates did not differ between women and men. 9,10 Women <45 years of age had a higher risk of recurrent mental SA than women aged ≥45 years, while no age differences were observed in men. Mental SA recurrences were most frequent in the lowest income categories in both genders. 10

Virtanen et al. 6 reported that manual workers (e.g., cleaners and maintenance) had a 25% higher risk and lower-grade non-manual workers (e.g., technicians and nurses) had a 15% higher risk of recurrent mental SA as compared with upper-grade non-manual workers (e.g., teachers and physicians). These results indicate that not only the incidence and recovery, but also recurrences of mental SA may differ between occupations. Virtanen et al. 6 suggested further research to assess the generalizability of these findings. Their sample comprised public sector workers and the impact of mental illness on SA differs across economic sectors. 6 Public sector workers with mental illness are 28% more likely to be off work sick than private sector workers with mental illness. 11 There is still a gap in our knowledge of recurrent mental SA, particularly in the private sector. 12 The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence, recovery and recurrence of mental SA in private sector workers.

Methods

Study population

Data of all 15 461 workers who were employed at a steel company in the period from January 2000 to December 2009 were retrieved from an occupational health service (OHS) register. For workers who were employed at the steel company, baseline was set on 1 January 2000. For those who started working at the steel company after January 2000, baseline was set on the date they entered employment. A total of 4857 workers left the company during the 10-year study period; their data were censored when their employment ended.

Of all 15 461 workers, 53% were production workers (e.g., steel workers, process operators and maintenance technicians) and 40% were office workers (e.g., administrators, technologists and managers); data on occupation were missing for 1092 (7%) workers. As we wanted to compare production workers with office workers, the 14 369 workers whose occupation was known were eligible for analysis. They were followed for a mean (standard deviation) period of 6.9 (3.6) years, amounting to a total of 101 118 person years at the end of the 10-year study period. The Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen granted ethical clearance for this register-based study.

Mental SA

In the Netherlands, SA is defined as a financially compensated temporary leave from work due to work-related and non–work-related injuries and illness. SA is employer compensated provided that it is medically certified by an occupational physician (OP) within 3 weeks of reporting sick. OPs certify SA with a diagnostic code derived from the 10th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). 13 SA episodes lasting ≥3 weeks and OP certified as due to emotional disturbance (ICD-10 R45) or mental and behavioural disorder (ICD-10 F00–F99) were defined as mental SA. 5 The first mental SA episode since baseline was called index mental SA. In line with Dutch SA insurance policies, recurrent mental SA was defined as any mental SA episode occurring >28 days after recovery from index mental SA.

Statistics

The incidence density (ID) was calculated by dividing the number of index mental SA episodes by the person years at risk. Differences between production and office workers were investigated by calculating the ID ratio, that is, ID office workers /ID production workers . The time to recovery from index mental SA in production and office workers was analysed by Cox regression analysis, controlling for baseline age (≤25, 26–35, 36–45, 46–55 and >55 years), gender (men, women), marital status (single, married) and employment [part time (<36 hours/week) or full time (≥36 hours/week)]. After index mental SA, the recurrence density (RD) was calculated by dividing the number of recurrent mental SA episodes by the person years at risk of recurrence. Differences between production and office workers were investigated by calculating the RD ratio, that is, RD office workers /RD production workers . ID and RD ratios were considered significant if the value 1 was not within the 95% confidence interval (CI).

The time to recurrent mental SA in production and office workers was analysed by Cox regression analysis, and stratified by age, gender, marital status and employment at baseline. All statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 20.0).

Results

The study population included 14 369 (8164 production and 6205 office) workers, whose baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1 . There were more men and full timers among production workers than among office workers. Age and marital status did not differ significantly between production and office workers ( Table 1 ).

Table 1

Baseline study population characteristics

Production workers ( N = 8164)
Office workers ( N = 6205)
Chi-square analysis
N%N%
Age (years)P = 0.41
    ≤251247154287
    26–35171421157325
    36–45255831190131
    46–55225128179629
    >5539455068
GenderP < 0.01
    Men802298514183
    Women1422106417
Marital statusP = 0.12
    Single314439206633
    Married502061413967
Employment aP < 0.01
    Part time181276412
    Full time798398544188
Production workers ( N = 8164)
Office workers ( N = 6205)
Chi-square analysis
N%N%
Age (years)P = 0.41
    ≤251247154287
    26–35171421157325
    36–45255831190131
    46–55225128179629
    >5539455068
GenderP < 0.01
    Men802298514183
    Women1422106417
Marital statusP = 0.12
    Single314439206633
    Married502061413967
Employment aP < 0.01
    Part time181276412
    Full time798398544188

a: Part-time employment corresponds to <36 work hours/week and full-time employment to ≥36 work hours/week.

Table 1

Baseline study population characteristics

Production workers ( N = 8164)
Office workers ( N = 6205)
Chi-square analysis
N%N%
Age (years)P = 0.41
    ≤251247154287
    26–35171421157325
    36–45255831190131
    46–55225128179629
    >5539455068
GenderP < 0.01
    Men802298514183
    Women1422106417
Marital statusP = 0.12
    Single314439206633
    Married502061413967
Employment aP < 0.01
    Part time181276412
    Full time798398544188
Production workers ( N = 8164)
Office workers ( N = 6205)
Chi-square analysis
N%N%
Age (years)P = 0.41
    ≤251247154287
    26–35171421157325
    36–45255831190131
    46–55225128179629
    >5539455068
GenderP < 0.01
    Men802298514183
    Women1422106417
Marital statusP = 0.12
    Single314439206633
    Married502061413967
Employment aP < 0.01
    Part time181276412
    Full time798398544188

a: Part-time employment corresponds to <36 work hours/week and full-time employment to ≥36 work hours/week.

Index mental SA

A total of 1314 workers (ID = 13.0, 95% CI 12.3–13.7 per 1000 person years) had at least one mental SA episode in the 10-year observation period: 647 (49%) workers were diagnosed with emotional disturbances (ICD-10 R45), 85 (6%) with mood disorders (ICD-10 F30–39) and 536 (41%) with neurotic disorders (ICD-10 F40–49); the remaining 46 workers had index mental SA diagnosed within other ICD-10 F categories. Index mental SA was less common in office workers (ID = 10.2, 95% CI 9.3–11.2 per 1000 person years) than in production workers (ID = 14.9, 95% CI 13.9–15.8 per 1000 person years), with a significant ID ratio of 0.69 (95% CI 0.61–0.77). SA due to emotional disturbances and neurotic disorders was more frequent among production workers, but the time to recovery from these types of mental SA was longer among office workers ( Table 2 ). After adjustment for age, gender, marital status and employment, the time to recovery from SA due to emotional disturbances [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99] and neurotic disorders (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.90) remained longer in office workers as compared with production workers.

Table 2

Incidence of mental SA and time to recovery of mental SA in production and office workers

Incidence (95% CI) per 1000 person years
Time to recovery (days)
Production worker Office worker Ratio a (95% CI) Production worker Office worker HR b (95% CI)
Index SA14.9 (13.9–15.8)10.2 (9.3–11.2)0.69 (0.61–0.77)**74 (13–135)90 (46–134)0.84 (0.56–1.15)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)7.7 (7.0–8.4)4.5 (3.9–5.2)0.59 (0.50–0.70)**37 (32–42)62 (44–81)0.76 (0.64–0.91)**
    Mood disorders (F30–39)1.0 (0.7–1.2)0.6 (0.4–0.9)0.65 (0.41–1.03)189 (140–238)236 (172–300)0.64 (0.39–1.03)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)5.7 (5.1–6.3)4.7 (4.0–5.4) 0.82 (0.69–0.98) *133 (116–150)190 (166–214) 0.80 (0.67–0.95) *
Recurrent SA30.5 (24.6–35.5)35.6 (31.4–39.8)0.86 (0.68–1.08)80 (63–97)133 (82–184)0.71 (0.54–1.01)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)17.2 (14.3–20.1)11.5 (7.9–15.1) 0.67 (0.47–0.95) *50 (33–67)65 (38–92)0.78 (0.50–1.18)
    Mood disorders (F30–39)3.3 (2.0–3.5)2.7 (0.9–4.4)0.81 (0.38–1.74)85 (8–262)95 (0–307)0.83 (0.41–1.23)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)13.6 (10.9–16.2)14.1 (10.1–18.1)1.04 (0.74–1.47)118 (87–149)173 (72–274)0.75 (0.51–1.21)
Incidence (95% CI) per 1000 person years
Time to recovery (days)
Production worker Office worker Ratio a (95% CI) Production worker Office worker HR b (95% CI)
Index SA14.9 (13.9–15.8)10.2 (9.3–11.2)0.69 (0.61–0.77)**74 (13–135)90 (46–134)0.84 (0.56–1.15)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)7.7 (7.0–8.4)4.5 (3.9–5.2)0.59 (0.50–0.70)**37 (32–42)62 (44–81)0.76 (0.64–0.91)**
    Mood disorders (F30–39)1.0 (0.7–1.2)0.6 (0.4–0.9)0.65 (0.41–1.03)189 (140–238)236 (172–300)0.64 (0.39–1.03)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)5.7 (5.1–6.3)4.7 (4.0–5.4) 0.82 (0.69–0.98) *133 (116–150)190 (166–214) 0.80 (0.67–0.95) *
Recurrent SA30.5 (24.6–35.5)35.6 (31.4–39.8)0.86 (0.68–1.08)80 (63–97)133 (82–184)0.71 (0.54–1.01)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)17.2 (14.3–20.1)11.5 (7.9–15.1) 0.67 (0.47–0.95) *50 (33–67)65 (38–92)0.78 (0.50–1.18)
    Mood disorders (F30–39)3.3 (2.0–3.5)2.7 (0.9–4.4)0.81 (0.38–1.74)85 (8–262)95 (0–307)0.83 (0.41–1.23)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)13.6 (10.9–16.2)14.1 (10.1–18.1)1.04 (0.74–1.47)118 (87–149)173 (72–274)0.75 (0.51–1.21)

Notes: The table shows the incidence of (recurrent) mental SA in production and office workers, the median and 95% CI time to recovery from mental SA and unadjusted HR of Cox regression analysis of the time to recovery.

a: Office workers relative to production workers; ratio <1 indicates that production workers have a higher incidence than office workers.

b: Office workers relative to production workers; HR <1 indicates that office workers have longer duration mental SA than production workers.

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Table 2

Incidence of mental SA and time to recovery of mental SA in production and office workers

Incidence (95% CI) per 1000 person years
Time to recovery (days)
Production worker Office worker Ratio a (95% CI) Production worker Office worker HR b (95% CI)
Index SA14.9 (13.9–15.8)10.2 (9.3–11.2)0.69 (0.61–0.77)**74 (13–135)90 (46–134)0.84 (0.56–1.15)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)7.7 (7.0–8.4)4.5 (3.9–5.2)0.59 (0.50–0.70)**37 (32–42)62 (44–81)0.76 (0.64–0.91)**
    Mood disorders (F30–39)1.0 (0.7–1.2)0.6 (0.4–0.9)0.65 (0.41–1.03)189 (140–238)236 (172–300)0.64 (0.39–1.03)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)5.7 (5.1–6.3)4.7 (4.0–5.4) 0.82 (0.69–0.98) *133 (116–150)190 (166–214) 0.80 (0.67–0.95) *
Recurrent SA30.5 (24.6–35.5)35.6 (31.4–39.8)0.86 (0.68–1.08)80 (63–97)133 (82–184)0.71 (0.54–1.01)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)17.2 (14.3–20.1)11.5 (7.9–15.1) 0.67 (0.47–0.95) *50 (33–67)65 (38–92)0.78 (0.50–1.18)
    Mood disorders (F30–39)3.3 (2.0–3.5)2.7 (0.9–4.4)0.81 (0.38–1.74)85 (8–262)95 (0–307)0.83 (0.41–1.23)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)13.6 (10.9–16.2)14.1 (10.1–18.1)1.04 (0.74–1.47)118 (87–149)173 (72–274)0.75 (0.51–1.21)
Incidence (95% CI) per 1000 person years
Time to recovery (days)
Production worker Office worker Ratio a (95% CI) Production worker Office worker HR b (95% CI)
Index SA14.9 (13.9–15.8)10.2 (9.3–11.2)0.69 (0.61–0.77)**74 (13–135)90 (46–134)0.84 (0.56–1.15)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)7.7 (7.0–8.4)4.5 (3.9–5.2)0.59 (0.50–0.70)**37 (32–42)62 (44–81)0.76 (0.64–0.91)**
    Mood disorders (F30–39)1.0 (0.7–1.2)0.6 (0.4–0.9)0.65 (0.41–1.03)189 (140–238)236 (172–300)0.64 (0.39–1.03)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)5.7 (5.1–6.3)4.7 (4.0–5.4) 0.82 (0.69–0.98) *133 (116–150)190 (166–214) 0.80 (0.67–0.95) *
Recurrent SA30.5 (24.6–35.5)35.6 (31.4–39.8)0.86 (0.68–1.08)80 (63–97)133 (82–184)0.71 (0.54–1.01)
    Emotional disturbance (R45)17.2 (14.3–20.1)11.5 (7.9–15.1) 0.67 (0.47–0.95) *50 (33–67)65 (38–92)0.78 (0.50–1.18)
    Mood disorders (F30–39)3.3 (2.0–3.5)2.7 (0.9–4.4)0.81 (0.38–1.74)85 (8–262)95 (0–307)0.83 (0.41–1.23)
    Neurotic disorders (F40–49)13.6 (10.9–16.2)14.1 (10.1–18.1)1.04 (0.74–1.47)118 (87–149)173 (72–274)0.75 (0.51–1.21)

Notes: The table shows the incidence of (recurrent) mental SA in production and office workers, the median and 95% CI time to recovery from mental SA and unadjusted HR of Cox regression analysis of the time to recovery.

a: Office workers relative to production workers; ratio <1 indicates that production workers have a higher incidence than office workers.

b: Office workers relative to production workers; HR <1 indicates that office workers have longer duration mental SA than production workers.

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Recurrent mental SA

Of the 1314 workers with index mental SA, 375 (273 production and 102 office) workers had recurrent mental SA (RD = 34.1, 95% CI 30.6–37.5 per 1000 person years); 257 (69%) had one recurrence, 78 (21%) two recurrences, 25 (7%) three recurrences and 15 (4%) four or more recurrences during the 10-year observation period. Thirty percent of workers with recurrent mental SA experienced the recurrence within 6 months of recovery from index mental SA, cumulating to 42% within 12 months, 54% within 18 months, 64% within 24 months and 76% within 36 months.

The overall recurrence rate of mental SA did not differ significantly between office and production workers (RD ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.68–1.08), but SA due to emotional disturbances recurred more often in production workers than in office workers ( Table 2 ). The median time to recurrent mental SA was 15.9 (95% CI 10.1–17.9) months. The time to onset of recurrent mental SA was shorter in office workers (14.9, 95% CI 9.9–17.5 months) than in production workers (16.7, 95% CI 11.9–19.8 months), although the difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.78–1.35). The median time to recurrent SA was 9.5, 11.9 and 17.3 months after index mental SA due to mood disorders, emotional disturbance and neurotic disorders, respectively ( Table 3 ).

Table 3

Recurrent mental SA

Index mental SA Production workers
Office workers
Total
( N = 273) ( N = 102) (N = 375)
Emotional disturbance (R45)11.3 (7.7–14.9)12.7 (2.1–23.2)11.9 (5.5–17.5)
Mood disorders (F30–39)10.0 (1.0–28.8)7.5 (1.0–19.2)9.5 (1.0–14.4)
Neurotic disorders (F40–49)18.7 (11.6–25.8)13.8 (9.6–17.9)17.3 (13.3–23.3)
Index mental SA Production workers
Office workers
Total
( N = 273) ( N = 102) (N = 375)
Emotional disturbance (R45)11.3 (7.7–14.9)12.7 (2.1–23.2)11.9 (5.5–17.5)
Mood disorders (F30–39)10.0 (1.0–28.8)7.5 (1.0–19.2)9.5 (1.0–14.4)
Neurotic disorders (F40–49)18.7 (11.6–25.8)13.8 (9.6–17.9)17.3 (13.3–23.3)

Notes: The table shows median (95% CI) time to onset of any mental SA in months following index mental SA.

Table 3

Recurrent mental SA

Index mental SA Production workers
Office workers
Total
( N = 273) ( N = 102) (N = 375)
Emotional disturbance (R45)11.3 (7.7–14.9)12.7 (2.1–23.2)11.9 (5.5–17.5)
Mood disorders (F30–39)10.0 (1.0–28.8)7.5 (1.0–19.2)9.5 (1.0–14.4)
Neurotic disorders (F40–49)18.7 (11.6–25.8)13.8 (9.6–17.9)17.3 (13.3–23.3)
Index mental SA Production workers
Office workers
Total
( N = 273) ( N = 102) (N = 375)
Emotional disturbance (R45)11.3 (7.7–14.9)12.7 (2.1–23.2)11.9 (5.5–17.5)
Mood disorders (F30–39)10.0 (1.0–28.8)7.5 (1.0–19.2)9.5 (1.0–14.4)
Neurotic disorders (F40–49)18.7 (11.6–25.8)13.8 (9.6–17.9)17.3 (13.3–23.3)

Notes: The table shows median (95% CI) time to onset of any mental SA in months following index mental SA.

In both production and office workers, the time to recurrent mental SA was shortest for workers aged >55 years ( Table 4 ). Ninety-one percent of them experienced recurrent mental SA within 12 months of index mental SA. The median time to recurrence in workers >55 years was 3.7 (95% CI 2.5–4.9) months. Gender, marital status and employment did not significantly affect the time to onset of recurrent mental SA.

Table 4

Recurrent mental SA stratified by age, gender, marital status and employment

Production workers ( N = 273)
Office workers ( N = 102)
Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Age (years)
    ≤2516.3 (9.6–23.7)Reference16.2 (8.1–24.6)Reference
    26–3515.4 (8.8–22.1)1.07 (0.77–1.69)16.0 (7.1–25.9)1.01 (0.81–1.67)
    36–4512.1 (4.0–20.2)1.12 (0.83–1.65)13.8 (8.1–19.5)1.21 (0.92–1.74)
    46–5518.7 (13.5–23.9)0.85 (0.65–1.31)15.4 (10.8–20.0)1.09 (0.68–1.48)
    >553.1 (2.0–8.4)3.73 (1.84–5.55)**3.9 (2.7–5.0)2.24 (1.67–4.48)**
Gender
    Men16.7 (12.2–21.2) NA b14.9 (11.4–18.4)0.85 (0.42–1.73)
    Women NA b NA b15.5 (0.0–31.1)Reference
Marital status
    Single18.2 (11.7–24.7)1.14 (0.77–1.70)15.8 (0.0–39.5)1.07 (0.56–2.05)
    Married16.2 (11.4–21.0)Reference14.9 (11.4–18.3)Reference
Employment a
    Part time7.6 (0.0–16.7)1.12 (0.46–2.75)10.1 (0.0–22.8)1.02 (0.55–1.89)
    Full time16.7 (12.5–20.9)Reference15.4 (10.8–20.1)Reference
Production workers ( N = 273)
Office workers ( N = 102)
Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Age (years)
    ≤2516.3 (9.6–23.7)Reference16.2 (8.1–24.6)Reference
    26–3515.4 (8.8–22.1)1.07 (0.77–1.69)16.0 (7.1–25.9)1.01 (0.81–1.67)
    36–4512.1 (4.0–20.2)1.12 (0.83–1.65)13.8 (8.1–19.5)1.21 (0.92–1.74)
    46–5518.7 (13.5–23.9)0.85 (0.65–1.31)15.4 (10.8–20.0)1.09 (0.68–1.48)
    >553.1 (2.0–8.4)3.73 (1.84–5.55)**3.9 (2.7–5.0)2.24 (1.67–4.48)**
Gender
    Men16.7 (12.2–21.2) NA b14.9 (11.4–18.4)0.85 (0.42–1.73)
    Women NA b NA b15.5 (0.0–31.1)Reference
Marital status
    Single18.2 (11.7–24.7)1.14 (0.77–1.70)15.8 (0.0–39.5)1.07 (0.56–2.05)
    Married16.2 (11.4–21.0)Reference14.9 (11.4–18.3)Reference
Employment a
    Part time7.6 (0.0–16.7)1.12 (0.46–2.75)10.1 (0.0–22.8)1.02 (0.55–1.89)
    Full time16.7 (12.5–20.9)Reference15.4 (10.8–20.1)Reference

Notes: The table shows median and 95% CI of the time to onset of any mental SA in months following index mental SA and HR of Cox regression analysis; HR >1.0 indicates a shorter time to onset of recurrent mental SA as compared with the reference category and HR <1.0 indicates a longer time to onset.

a: Part-time employment corresponds to <36 work hours/week and full-time employment to ≥36 work hours/week.

b: Not analysed because there was only one female production worker with recurrent mental SA.

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Table 4

Recurrent mental SA stratified by age, gender, marital status and employment

Production workers ( N = 273)
Office workers ( N = 102)
Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Age (years)
    ≤2516.3 (9.6–23.7)Reference16.2 (8.1–24.6)Reference
    26–3515.4 (8.8–22.1)1.07 (0.77–1.69)16.0 (7.1–25.9)1.01 (0.81–1.67)
    36–4512.1 (4.0–20.2)1.12 (0.83–1.65)13.8 (8.1–19.5)1.21 (0.92–1.74)
    46–5518.7 (13.5–23.9)0.85 (0.65–1.31)15.4 (10.8–20.0)1.09 (0.68–1.48)
    >553.1 (2.0–8.4)3.73 (1.84–5.55)**3.9 (2.7–5.0)2.24 (1.67–4.48)**
Gender
    Men16.7 (12.2–21.2) NA b14.9 (11.4–18.4)0.85 (0.42–1.73)
    Women NA b NA b15.5 (0.0–31.1)Reference
Marital status
    Single18.2 (11.7–24.7)1.14 (0.77–1.70)15.8 (0.0–39.5)1.07 (0.56–2.05)
    Married16.2 (11.4–21.0)Reference14.9 (11.4–18.3)Reference
Employment a
    Part time7.6 (0.0–16.7)1.12 (0.46–2.75)10.1 (0.0–22.8)1.02 (0.55–1.89)
    Full time16.7 (12.5–20.9)Reference15.4 (10.8–20.1)Reference
Production workers ( N = 273)
Office workers ( N = 102)
Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)Median (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Age (years)
    ≤2516.3 (9.6–23.7)Reference16.2 (8.1–24.6)Reference
    26–3515.4 (8.8–22.1)1.07 (0.77–1.69)16.0 (7.1–25.9)1.01 (0.81–1.67)
    36–4512.1 (4.0–20.2)1.12 (0.83–1.65)13.8 (8.1–19.5)1.21 (0.92–1.74)
    46–5518.7 (13.5–23.9)0.85 (0.65–1.31)15.4 (10.8–20.0)1.09 (0.68–1.48)
    >553.1 (2.0–8.4)3.73 (1.84–5.55)**3.9 (2.7–5.0)2.24 (1.67–4.48)**
Gender
    Men16.7 (12.2–21.2) NA b14.9 (11.4–18.4)0.85 (0.42–1.73)
    Women NA b NA b15.5 (0.0–31.1)Reference
Marital status
    Single18.2 (11.7–24.7)1.14 (0.77–1.70)15.8 (0.0–39.5)1.07 (0.56–2.05)
    Married16.2 (11.4–21.0)Reference14.9 (11.4–18.3)Reference
Employment a
    Part time7.6 (0.0–16.7)1.12 (0.46–2.75)10.1 (0.0–22.8)1.02 (0.55–1.89)
    Full time16.7 (12.5–20.9)Reference15.4 (10.8–20.1)Reference

Notes: The table shows median and 95% CI of the time to onset of any mental SA in months following index mental SA and HR of Cox regression analysis; HR >1.0 indicates a shorter time to onset of recurrent mental SA as compared with the reference category and HR <1.0 indicates a longer time to onset.

a: Part-time employment corresponds to <36 work hours/week and full-time employment to ≥36 work hours/week.

b: Not analysed because there was only one female production worker with recurrent mental SA.

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Discussion

In this 10-year observational study, 1314 of 14 369 workers employed in the private industrial sector had at least one episode of SA due to mental disorders. In line with previous research, mental SA was more common in production workers, but office workers needed a longer time to recover from mental SA. This study confirmed that the risk of mental SA increased after index mental SA. 6,9,10 In addition, we showed that recurrence rates of mental SA did not differ between production and office workers. Workers aged >55 years were at increased risk of early onset recurrent mental SA.

Incidence of mental SA

The incidence of mental SA in this study of private sector industrial workers was lower than that reported by Virtanen et al. 6 for public sector workers in Finland. This finding supports that mental illness has greater impact on public sector workers than private sector workers. 11 The current results confirm that the risk of mental SA in production workers was higher than in office workers. Hence, the previously reported higher incidence of mental SA among manual workers as compared with upper-grade non-manual workers in the public sector also seems to apply to the private sector. A meta-analysis of the literature provided robust evidence that high job demands and low decision latitude as well as combinations of high efforts and low rewards are risk factors for common mental disorders. 14,15 In production work, job demands in terms of work pace can be high and control over the production process restricted, which may explain the higher risk of mental SA among production workers. In addition, office workers may experience higher levels of self-efficacy and might employ more adequate coping strategies to buffer the impact of stressors. 6,16 Part of the difference in recurrent mental SA could also be explained by juvenile-onset mental disorders, especially anxiety disorders and impulse-control disorders. Adolescents with such mental disorders are prone to school dropout, which has been associated with an excess risk of disabling neurotic disorders. 17 It is interesting to note that it was particularly the incidence of mental SA due to neurotic disorders that was higher in production workers than in office workers.

Recovery from mental SA

Although the risk of mental SA is higher among production workers, office workers sick listed with emotional disturbance or neurotic disorders were longer absent from work. In the Finnish public sector, upper-grade non-manual public sector workers sick listed with reactions to severe stress or adjustment disorders returned to work later than manual workers, although the difference was not significant. 6 Public sector manual workers with depressive disorders were longer absent from work than upper-grade manual workers. In contrast, we found that a median time to return to work was 189 days in production workers and 236 days in office workers with mood disorders, although the difference was not statistically significant, probably due to the low number ( N = 85) of mental SA episodes certified as mood disorder. One possible explanation for the longer time to return to work may be that office workers have more complex jobs with high cognitive demands, which may be difficult to return to in case of a mental disorder. 18,19

An alternative explanation might be the stigma of mental disorders. 20,21 In occupational healthcare practice, we notice that managers find it difficult to return to work when they have had mental SA, possibly due to feelings of shame, reduced self-esteem, inefficacy beliefs and prestige status loss. However, we found no literature to support this empirical hypothesis.

Recurrence of mental SA

The overall risk of recurrent mental SA did not differ between production and office workers, but SA due to emotional disturbance recurred more frequently in production workers. Virtanen et al. found a higher recurrence risk of mental SA among manual workers as compared with upper-grade non-manual workers. The authors explained this finding by differences in treatment: compliance was poorer and resistance greater among manual workers. 6 In addition, upper-grade manual workers more often arranged private psychotherapy instead of being referred to state-subsidised psychotherapy. In the Netherlands, SA is employer compensated. As a consequence, it is not unusual that employers pay private psychotherapy to expedite return to work of workers with mental SA.

The time to recurrent mental SA was shortest after an index episode due to mood disorders, particularly in office workers. Apart from clinical variables (e.g., severity, comorbid psychopathology) and a family history of affective disorders, negative cognitions and high neuroticism have been identified as psychological risk factors for recurrent depression. 22 It is conceivable that negative cognitions and high neuroticism are more inconvenient for office work as compared with production work. It is interesting to note that we also found a shorter time to onset of recurrent mental SA after index SA due to neurotic disorders in office workers (13.8 months) than in production workers (18.7 months), although the difference was not statistically significant.

Age was a risk factor for recurrent mental SA. Both office and production workers aged >55 years were particularly at risk of recurrent mental SA. This contrasts the previous findings in Dutch postal workers, where women aged <45 years were at risk of recurrent mental SA. 9,10 The study populations may not be comparable, as many postal workers had temporary (seasonal) employment with high job turnover rates.

Study strengths and limitations

The large cohort of 14 369 workers and the 10-year observation period are strengths of the study. As all workers were employed at the same company, differences in SA could not be attributed to organizational policies and practices. 21 Although workers were employed in a wide variety of occupations, ranging from unskilled steel workers to executive managers, the study population was not a random sample and may therefore not be representative of the Dutch industrial sector.

The use of OP diagnoses for mental SA can be considered an asset of the study, because self-reported SA diagnoses may be subject to both recall bias and social desirability bias. The agreement between OPs and psychiatrists was found to be reasonable for specific mental diagnoses, although there is less agreement with regard to non-specified mental disorders. 23

A limitation of the study is that the OHS register allows only one OP diagnostic code for each SA episode. Hence, information on comorbidity was not available, while Buist-Bouwman et al. 24 reported that mental disorders with comorbid physical disorders result in longer periods of SA.

Practical implications

Recently, Arends et al. 25 emphasized the importance of continued attention after return to work of workers who have been absent from work due to mental disorders. In our study population, the median time to recurrent mental SA was 9.5 months after an index episode due to mood disorders. The median time to onset of recurrent mental SA was 12.7 and 13.8 months after index mental SA due to emotional disturbances and neurotic disorders, respectively. Knowledge about the time to onset of recurrent mental SA is useful for planning preventive consultations. For example, OPs could consider to invite workers 6 months after recovery from SA due to mood disorders and 9 months after recovery from neurotic disorders. Workers aged >55 years were identified as high-risk group for recurrent mental SA and should be invited at shorter notice, that is, within 3 months of recovery from mental SA. Preventive consultations provide an opportunity to assess mental problems and work functioning. The OP can refer workers, if appropriate, to interventions aimed at improving mental health and work functioning to prevent recurrences of mental SA.

It should be kept in mind that the abovementioned strategic time points for preventive consultations are based on the median time to recurrent mental SA. Thus, half of the workers may develop mental SA later on, accentuating the need to pay continued attention to workers who have recovered from mental SA. 25 On the other hand, we should not impose a patient role on workers who have recovered from mental SA. We have to look for ways to monitor workers after recovery from mental SA without troubling them too much. For example, healthcare providers could ask supervisors how workers perform after recovery from mental SA. Alternatively, we could consider developing digital applications that advise workers at risk of mental SA to consult healthcare providers to assess the need for further diagnosis and treatment. 26,27

Conclusion

Mental SA is more common in production workers than in office workers employed in the industrial sector. Although recurrence rates did not differ between office and production workers, the time to onset of recurrent mental SA was tangibly shorter in office workers. Occupational healthcare providers should pay special attention to workers aged >55 years as they are at increased risk of recurrent mental SA within 12 months of recovery from mental SA.

Conflicts of interest : None declared.

Key points

  • The incidence of mental sickness absence is higher in production workers than in office workers in the industrial sector.

  • Mental sickness absence recurs as frequently in production workers as in office workers in the industrial sector.

  • Occupational healthcare providers should pay special attention to workers aged >55 years as they are at increased risk of recurrent mental sickness absence.

References

1
ESEMeD
Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project
Acta Psychiatr Scand
2004
, vol. 
109
 
Suppl 1
(pg. 
21
-
7
)
2
ESEMeD
Disability and quality of life impact of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project
Acta Psychiatr Scand
2004
, vol. 
109
 
Suppl 1
(pg. 
38
-
46
)
3
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
Transforming Disability into Ability: Policies to Promote Work and Income for Disabled People
2003
Paris
OECD
4
Henderson
M
Harvey
SB
Overland
S
, et al. 
Work and common psychiatric disorders
J R Soc Med
2011
, vol. 
104
 (pg. 
198
-
207
)
5
Roelen
CA
Norder
G
Koopmans
PC
, et al. 
Workers sick-listed with mental disorders: who returns to work and when?
J Occup Rehabil
2012
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
409
-
17
)
6
Virtanen
M
Kawachi
I
Oksanen
T
, et al. 
Socio-economic differences in long-term psychiatric work disability: prospective cohort study of onset, recovery and recurrence
Occup Environ Med
2011
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
791
-
8
)
7
Warden
D
Rush
AJ
Wisniewski
SR
, et al. 
Income and attrition in the treatment of depression: a STAR*D report
Depress Anxiety
2009
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
622
-
33
)
8
De Graaf
R
Bijl
RV
Smit
F
, et al. 
Risk factors for 12-month comorbidity of mood, anxiety, and substance-use disorders: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study
Am J Psychiatry
2002
, vol. 
159
 (pg. 
620
-
9
)
9
Koopmans
PC
Bültmann
U
Roelen
CA
, et al. 
Recurrence of sickness absence due to common mental disorders
Int Arch Occup Environ Health
2011
, vol. 
84
 (pg. 
193
-
201
)
10
Koopmans
PC
Roelen
CA
Bültmann
U
, et al. 
Gender and age differences in the recurrence of sickness absence due to common mental disorders: a longitudinal study
BMC Public Health
2012
, vol. 
10
 pg. 
426
 
11
Whittaker
W
Sutton
M
MacDonald
S
, et al. 
The effect of mental ill health on absence from work in different occupational classifications: analysis of routine data in the British Household Panel Survey
J Occup Environ Med
2012
, vol. 
54
 (pg. 
1539
-
44
)
12
Bhui
KS
Dinos
S
Stansfeld
SA
White
PD
A synthesis of the evidence for managing stress at work: a review of the reviews reporting on anxiety, depression and absenteeism
J Environ Public Health
2012
(pg. 
515
-
874
)
13
World Health Organisation
International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: ICD-10
1994
Geneva
WHO
14
Stansfeld
S
Candy
B
Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review
Scand J Work Environ Health
2006
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
443
-
62
)
15
Nieuwenhuijsen
K
Bruinvels
D
Frings-Dresen
M
Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review
Occup Med
2010
, vol. 
60
 (pg. 
277
-
86
)
16
Lorant
V
Deliège
D
Eaton
W
, et al. 
Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis
Am J Epidemiol
2003
, vol. 
157
 (pg. 
98
-
112
)
17
Melzer
D
Fryers
T
Jenkins
R
, et al. 
Social position and the common mental disorders with disability: estimates from the National Psychiatric Survey of Great Britain
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol
2003
, vol. 
38
 (pg. 
238
-
43
)
18
Van der Klink
JJ
Back in Balance: the Development and Evaluation of an Occupational Health Intervention for Work-Related Adjustment Disorders
2000
Amsterdam
Academic Medical Center
19
Nieuwenhuijsen
K
Verbeek
JH
de Boer
AG
Blonk
RW
van Dijk
FJ
Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care
Scand J Work Environ Health
2006
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
67
-
74
)
20
Baumann
AE
Stigmatization, social distance and exclusion because of mental illness: the individual with mental illness as a ‘stranger’
Int Rev Psychiatry
2007
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
131
-
5
)
21
Metha
M
Kassam
A
Leese
M
, et al. 
Public attitudes towards people with mental illness in England and Scotland, 1994–2003
Br J Psychiatry
2009
, vol. 
194
 (pg. 
278
-
84
)
22
Burcusa
SL
Iacono
WG
Risk for recurrent depression
Clin Psychol Rev
2007
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
959
-
85
)
23
O’Niell
E
McNamee
R
Agius
R
, et al. 
The validity and reliability of diagnoses of work-related mental ill-health
Occup Environ Med
2008
, vol. 
65
 (pg. 
726
-
31
)
24
Buist-Bouwman
MA
de Graaf
R
Vollebergh
WA
Ormel
J
Comorbidity of physical and mental disorders and the effect of work-loss days
Acta Psychiatr Scand
2005
, vol. 
111
 (pg. 
436
-
43
)
25
Arends
I
van der Klink
JJ
van Rhenen
W
, et al. 
Prevention of recurrent sickness absence in workers with common mental disorders: results of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Occup Environ Med
2014
, vol. 
71
 (pg. 
21
-
9
)
26
Dale
O
Hagen
KB
Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data
J Clin Epidemiol
2007
, vol. 
60
 (pg. 
8
-
17
)
27
Roelen
CA
Hoedeman
R
van Rhenen
W
, et al. 
Mental health symptoms as prognostic risk markers of all-cause and psychiatric sickness absence in office workers
Eur J Public Health
2014
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
101
-
5
)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.